The Civil Procedure (Amendment) Rules 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Amendment of Part 26
(1) In 26.7(1)(a), for “when” substitute “after”. (2) In rule 26.9(10)— (a) in sub-paragraph (b)— (i) in paragraph (i), at the end, for “and” substitute “;”; and (ii) for paragraph (ii) substitute— (ii) there has been an admission of liability in full, which means that the defendant accepts that the claimant has suffered loss, including the injury set out in the letter of claim under the Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes, caused by the defendant’s breach of duty of care; and (iii) the admission in paragraph (ii) is made in the defendant’s letter of response provided in accordance with the Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes, provided that the defendant has not raised a defence to the claim under the Limitation Act 1980; ; (b) in sub-paragraph (d), at the end, omit “or”; (c) in sub-paragraph (e)(ii), at the end, for the full stop substitute “; or”; and (d) after sub-paragraph (e), insert— (f) a claim against a public authority for trespass to the person, unless, having regard to the matters mentioned in rule 26.13(1), the court considers that it would not be in the interests of justice to do so. .
6 Amendment of Part 26
(1) In 26.7(1)(a), for “when” substitute “after”. (2) In rule 26.9(10)— (a) in sub-paragraph (b)— (i) in paragraph (i), at the end, for “and” substitute “;”; and (ii) for paragraph (ii) substitute— (ii) there has been an admission of liability in full, which means that the defendant accepts that the claimant has suffered loss, including the injury set out in the letter of claim under the Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes, caused by the defendant’s breach of duty of care; and (iii) the admission in paragraph (ii) is made in the defendant’s letter of response provided in accordance with the Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes, provided that the defendant has not raised a defence to the claim under the Limitation Act 1980; ; (b) in sub-paragraph (d), at the end, omit “or”; (c) in sub-paragraph (e)(ii), at the end, for the full stop substitute “; or”; and (d) after sub-paragraph (e), insert— (f) a claim against a public authority for trespass to the person, unless, having regard to the matters mentioned in rule 26.13(1), the court considers that it would not be in the interests of justice to do so. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.