The Vehicle Emissions Trading Schemes (Amendment) (No. 2) Order 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
43 Amendment of Schedule 4 (low-volume CRTS participants and low-volume VRTS participants)
(1) Schedule 4 is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph 10— (a) in sub-paragraph (e) omit paragraph (ii); (b) after sub-paragraph (e) insert— (ea) the specific emissions of CO2 of the cars or the vans of which the applicant is the manufacturer; . (3) After paragraph 11 insert— 11A For a vehicle in relation to which an administrator has granted an application under Schedule 3A (alternative specific emissions of CO2: OVC hybrid electric vehicles), “specific emissions of CO2” in paragraph 10(ea) has the meaning it would have if that application had not been granted. .
43 Amendment of Schedule 4 (low-volume CRTS participants and low-volume VRTS participants)
(1) Schedule 4 is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph 10— (a) in sub-paragraph (e) omit paragraph (ii); (b) after sub-paragraph (e) insert— (ea) the specific emissions of CO2 of the cars or the vans of which the applicant is the manufacturer; . (3) After paragraph 11 insert— 11A For a vehicle in relation to which an administrator has granted an application under Schedule 3A (alternative specific emissions of CO2: OVC hybrid electric vehicles), “specific emissions of CO2” in paragraph 10(ea) has the meaning it would have if that application had not been granted. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.