Propose a change

The Aviation Safety (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2025

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

7 Amendment of Appendices to Annex 1 to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011

(1) In Appendix 1 (crediting of theoretical knowledge) to Annex 1 (Part-FCL), in point A (crediting of theoretical knowledge for the issue of a pilot licence – bridge instruction and examination requirements), in point 1 (LAPL and PPL), after point 1.3 insert— 1.3a. For the issue of a PPL(A), the holder of an NPPL(A) issued under The Air Navigation Order 2016 is considered to have complied with FCL.215 if they have passed the theoretical knowledge examinations in the following subjects: Principles of flight, Flight performance and planning, Radio Navigation, Aircraft general knowledge, Air law, Operational procedures. 1.3b. The holder of an NPPL(A) issued under The Air Navigation Order 2016 who has passed examinations in all subjects listed under FCL.215 will be fully credited with the requirements of theoretical knowledge instruction and examination for the issue of a PPL(A). . (2) In Appendix 8 (cross-crediting of the IR part of a class or type rating proficiency check) to Annex 1 (Part-FCL), for point B (helicopters) substitute— B.Helicopters Credits will be granted only if holders are revalidating or renewing IR privileges for single-pilot helicopters as set out below. If a skill test or proficiency check, including IR, is performed and the holder has a valid: (a) multi-pilot helicopter (MPH) type rating or (b) single-pilot helicopter (SPH) type rating, in multi-pilot operations or (c) single-pilot helicopter (SPH) type rating, in single-pilot operations, credit is valid towards the IR part of a proficiency check for single-pilot helicopter (SPH) rating, provided that within the preceding 12 months at least three IFR departures and approaches exercising PBN privileges, including one RNP APCH approach (which may be a Point in Space (PinS) approach), have been performed on an SP type of helicopter in SP operations. .

Your change, as a redline

7 Amendment of Appendices to Annex 1 to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011

(1) In Appendix 1 (crediting of theoretical knowledge) to Annex 1 (Part-FCL), in point A (crediting of theoretical knowledge for the issue of a pilot licence – bridge instruction and examination requirements), in point 1 (LAPL and PPL), after point 1.3 insert— 1.3a. For the issue of a PPL(A), the holder of an NPPL(A) issued under The Air Navigation Order 2016 is considered to have complied with FCL.215 if they have passed the theoretical knowledge examinations in the following subjects: Principles of flight, Flight performance and planning, Radio Navigation, Aircraft general knowledge, Air law, Operational procedures. 1.3b. The holder of an NPPL(A) issued under The Air Navigation Order 2016 who has passed examinations in all subjects listed under FCL.215 will be fully credited with the requirements of theoretical knowledge instruction and examination for the issue of a PPL(A). . (2) In Appendix 8 (cross-crediting of the IR part of a class or type rating proficiency check) to Annex 1 (Part-FCL), for point B (helicopters) substitute— B.Helicopters Credits will be granted only if holders are revalidating or renewing IR privileges for single-pilot helicopters as set out below. If a skill test or proficiency check, including IR, is performed and the holder has a valid: (a) multi-pilot helicopter (MPH) type rating or (b) single-pilot helicopter (SPH) type rating, in multi-pilot operations or (c) single-pilot helicopter (SPH) type rating, in single-pilot operations, credit is valid towards the IR part of a proficiency check for single-pilot helicopter (SPH) rating, provided that within the preceding 12 months at least three IFR departures and approaches exercising PBN privileges, including one RNP APCH approach (which may be a Point in Space (PinS) approach), have been performed on an SP type of helicopter in SP operations. .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

How this law is officially changed

Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds