The Agriculture (Removal of Cross-Compliance and Miscellaneous Revocations and Amendments, etc.) (England) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
6 Amendment of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013
(1) Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 is amended as follows. (2) In Article 80 (scrutiny by the relevant authority)— (a) in paragraph 1— (i) for “shall”, in each place it occurs, substitute “may”; (ii) omit the second and third sentences; (b) in paragraph 2, for “shall” substitute “may”. (3) In Article 81 (objectives of the scrutiny)— (a) in paragraph 1— (i) after “The accuracy of” insert “any”; (ii) for “shall” substitute “may”; (b) in paragraph 2— (i) before “scrutiny” insert “any”; (ii) for “shall” substitute “may”; (c) omit paragraph 3. (4) In Article 82 (access to commercial documents)— (a) in paragraph 1, for “shall”, in the second place it occurs, substitute “may”; (b) in paragraph 3, in the first subparagraph— (i) for “shall” substitute “may”; (ii) for “such records as are required” substitute “such records as may be required”. (5) In Article 84 (programming)— (a) in paragraph 1, for “shall” substitute “may”; (b) in paragraph 2, for “shall”, in both places it occurs, substitute “may”; (c) in paragraph 3, for “shall” substitute “may”. (6) In Article 85(1) (special departments), for “shall”, in the first place it occurs, substitute “may”. (7) In Article 86(1) (reports), for “shall” substitute “may”.
6 Amendment of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013
(1) Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 on the financing, management and monitoring of the common agricultural policy and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 352/78, (EC) No 165/94, (EC) No 2799/98, (EC) No 814/2000, (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 485/2008 is amended as follows. (2) In Article 80 (scrutiny by the relevant authority)— (a) in paragraph 1— (i) for “shall”, in each place it occurs, substitute “may”; (ii) omit the second and third sentences; (b) in paragraph 2, for “shall” substitute “may”. (3) In Article 81 (objectives of the scrutiny)— (a) in paragraph 1— (i) after “The accuracy of” insert “any”; (ii) for “shall” substitute “may”; (b) in paragraph 2— (i) before “scrutiny” insert “any”; (ii) for “shall” substitute “may”; (c) omit paragraph 3. (4) In Article 82 (access to commercial documents)— (a) in paragraph 1, for “shall”, in the second place it occurs, substitute “may”; (b) in paragraph 3, in the first subparagraph— (i) for “shall” substitute “may”; (ii) for “such records as are required” substitute “such records as may be required”. (5) In Article 84 (programming)— (a) in paragraph 1, for “shall” substitute “may”; (b) in paragraph 2, for “shall”, in both places it occurs, substitute “may”; (c) in paragraph 3, for “shall” substitute “may”. (6) In Article 85(1) (special departments), for “shall”, in the first place it occurs, substitute “may”. (7) In Article 86(1) (reports), for “shall” substitute “may”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.