The Financial Services and Markets Act 2023 (Mutual Recognition Agreement) (Switzerland) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
35 Information gathering
The following provisions of FSMA 2000 apply in respect of a person to whom regulation 22 applies, as they apply in respect of an authorised person (within the meaning of section 31 of that Act)— (a) section 165 (regulators’ power to require information: authorised persons etc.); (b) section 166 (reports by skilled persons); (c) section 175 (information and documents: supplemental provisions); (d) section 177 (offences), in so far as it relates to a requirement imposed by the FCA in connection with a rule which applies to a person to whom regulation 22 applies by virtue of regulation 34(1).
35 Information gathering
The following provisions of FSMA 2000 apply in respect of a person to whom regulation 22 applies, as they apply in respect of an authorised person (within the meaning of section 31 of that Act)— (a) section 165 (regulators’ power to require information: authorised persons etc.); (b) section 166 (reports by skilled persons); (c) section 175 (information and documents: supplemental provisions); (d) section 177 (offences), in so far as it relates to a requirement imposed by the FCA in connection with a rule which applies to a person to whom regulation 22 applies by virtue of regulation 34(1).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.