The Carer’s Leave Regulations 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
12 Unfair dismissal
(1) An employee who is dismissed is entitled under section 99 of the 1996 Act to be regarded for the purposes of Part 10 of that Act as unfairly dismissed if the reason or principal reason for the dismissal is of a kind specified in paragraph (3). (2) An employee who is dismissed is also to be regarded for the purpose of Part 10 of the 1996 Act as unfairly dismissed if— (a) the reason or principal reason for the dismissal is that the employee was redundant, (b) it is shown that the circumstances constituting the redundancy applied to one or more employees in the same undertaking who had positions similar to that held by the employee and who have not been dismissed by the employer, and (c) it is shown that the reason or principal reason for which the employee was selected for dismissal was a reason of a kind specified in paragraph (3). (3) The reasons referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) are reasons connected with any of the following facts— (a) that the employee took, sought to take, or made use of the benefits of carer’s leave, or (b) that the employer believed that the employee was likely to take carer’s leave. (4) For the purposes of paragraph (3)(a), an employee makes use of the benefits of carer’s leave if, during the period of carer’s leave the employee benefits from any of the terms and conditions of employment preserved by regulation 9 during that period.
12 Unfair dismissal
(1) An employee who is dismissed is entitled under section 99 of the 1996 Act to be regarded for the purposes of Part 10 of that Act as unfairly dismissed if the reason or principal reason for the dismissal is of a kind specified in paragraph (3). (2) An employee who is dismissed is also to be regarded for the purpose of Part 10 of the 1996 Act as unfairly dismissed if— (a) the reason or principal reason for the dismissal is that the employee was redundant, (b) it is shown that the circumstances constituting the redundancy applied to one or more employees in the same undertaking who had positions similar to that held by the employee and who have not been dismissed by the employer, and (c) it is shown that the reason or principal reason for which the employee was selected for dismissal was a reason of a kind specified in paragraph (3). (3) The reasons referred to in paragraphs (1) and (2) are reasons connected with any of the following facts— (a) that the employee took, sought to take, or made use of the benefits of carer’s leave, or (b) that the employer believed that the employee was likely to take carer’s leave. (4) For the purposes of paragraph (3)(a), an employee makes use of the benefits of carer’s leave if, during the period of carer’s leave the employee benefits from any of the terms and conditions of employment preserved by regulation 9 during that period.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.