Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
11 Requests for reviews: general provision
(1) A person making a request for a review may include in the request particular questions about the death, or other harmful conduct, to which the review will relate. (2) The Commissioner for Investigations is to decide— (a) the form and manner in which a request for a review is to be made; (b) the circumstances (if any) in which a request for a review may be changed (including by changing particular questions included in the request) or withdrawn. (3) The Commissioner for Investigations may reject a request for a review that is not made in the required form or manner. (4) In a case where— (a) the ICRIR is carrying out a review of a death or other harmful conduct (whether following a request under section 9 or 10 or a decision by the ICRIR under section 12), and (b) a request (or subsequent request) is made for a review relating to that death or that other harmful conduct, the Commissioner for Investigations is to decide how that request is to be dealt with. (5) The Commissioner for Investigations may (in particular) decide— (a) to reject that request (or subsequent request), or (b) that, in a case where the ICRIR is carrying out the review following a request, the person or persons making the subsequent request are to be treated as if they had joined in the making of the earlier request. (6) In a case where— (a) the ICRIR has carried out a review of a death or other harmful conduct (whether following a request under section 9 or 10 or a decision by the ICRIR under section 12), and (b) a request (or subsequent request) is made for a review relating to that death or that other harmful conduct, the Commissioner for Investigations is to decide how that request is to be dealt with. (7) In deciding how that request is to be dealt with, the Commissioner for Investigations— (a) must take into account the review that has already been carried out; and (b) in particular, must ensure that the ICRIR does not do anything which duplicates any aspect of that review unless, in the ICRIR’s view, the duplication is necessary. (8) The Commissioner for Investigations may (in particular) decide to reject that request (or subsequent request).
11 Requests for reviews: general provision
(1) A person making a request for a review may include in the request particular questions about the death, or other harmful conduct, to which the review will relate. (2) The Commissioner for Investigations is to decide— (a) the form and manner in which a request for a review is to be made; (b) the circumstances (if any) in which a request for a review may be changed (including by changing particular questions included in the request) or withdrawn. (3) The Commissioner for Investigations may reject a request for a review that is not made in the required form or manner. (4) In a case where— (a) the ICRIR is carrying out a review of a death or other harmful conduct (whether following a request under section 9 or 10 or a decision by the ICRIR under section 12), and (b) a request (or subsequent request) is made for a review relating to that death or that other harmful conduct, the Commissioner for Investigations is to decide how that request is to be dealt with. (5) The Commissioner for Investigations may (in particular) decide— (a) to reject that request (or subsequent request), or (b) that, in a case where the ICRIR is carrying out the review following a request, the person or persons making the subsequent request are to be treated as if they had joined in the making of the earlier request. (6) In a case where— (a) the ICRIR has carried out a review of a death or other harmful conduct (whether following a request under section 9 or 10 or a decision by the ICRIR under section 12), and (b) a request (or subsequent request) is made for a review relating to that death or that other harmful conduct, the Commissioner for Investigations is to decide how that request is to be dealt with. (7) In deciding how that request is to be dealt with, the Commissioner for Investigations— (a) must take into account the review that has already been carried out; and (b) in particular, must ensure that the ICRIR does not do anything which duplicates any aspect of that review unless, in the ICRIR’s view, the duplication is necessary. (8) The Commissioner for Investigations may (in particular) decide to reject that request (or subsequent request).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.