The Statutory Shared Parental Pay (Parental Order Cases) Regulations 2014
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
14
Regulation 31 (conditions as to continuity of employment and normal weekly earnings in relation to a claimant) of the Pay Regulations as they apply to an intended parent or a parental order parent, shall read as if— (a) the words in paragraph (2) were— Where C’s birth occurs earlier than the 14th week before C’s expected week of birth paragraph (1) shall have effect as if, for the conditions set out there, there were substituted conditions that— (a) the person would have been in employer earner’s employment for a continuous period of at least 26 weeks ending with the relevant week had C been born after the relevant week; (b) the person’s normal weekly earnings for the period of eight weeks ending with the week immediately preceding C’s actual week of birth are not less than the lower earnings limit in force under section 5(1)(a) of the 1992 Act immediately before the commencement of C’s actual week of birth; and (c) the person continues in employed earner’s employment with the employer by reference to whom the condition in sub-paragraph (a) is satisfied for a continuous period beginning with the date of C’s birth and ending with the week before the first week falling within the relevant period relating to that person under section 171ZY(2) of the 1992 Act. . (b) the following paragraphs were added— (3) The references in this regulation to the relevant week are to the week immediately preceding the 14th week before C’s expected week of birth. (4) Where more than one child is born as a result of the same pregnancy the date the first child is born is to be used to determine C’s actual week of birth or the date of C’s birth. .
14
Regulation 31 (conditions as to continuity of employment and normal weekly earnings in relation to a claimant) of the Pay Regulations as they apply to an intended parent or a parental order parent, shall read as if— (a) the words in paragraph (2) were— Where C’s birth occurs earlier than the 14th week before C’s expected week of birth paragraph (1) shall have effect as if, for the conditions set out there, there were substituted conditions that— (a) the person would have been in employer earner’s employment for a continuous period of at least 26 weeks ending with the relevant week had C been born after the relevant week; (b) the person’s normal weekly earnings for the period of eight weeks ending with the week immediately preceding C’s actual week of birth are not less than the lower earnings limit in force under section 5(1)(a) of the 1992 Act immediately before the commencement of C’s actual week of birth; and (c) the person continues in employed earner’s employment with the employer by reference to whom the condition in sub-paragraph (a) is satisfied for a continuous period beginning with the date of C’s birth and ending with the week before the first week falling within the relevant period relating to that person under section 171ZY(2) of the 1992 Act. . (b) the following paragraphs were added— (3) The references in this regulation to the relevant week are to the week immediately preceding the 14th week before C’s expected week of birth. (4) Where more than one child is born as a result of the same pregnancy the date the first child is born is to be used to determine C’s actual week of birth or the date of C’s birth. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.