The Magistrates’ Courts (Detention, Freezing and Forfeiture of Terrorist Cryptoassets, and Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
10 Application for the variation or setting aside of a crypto wallet freezing order
(1) An application under paragraph 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 to vary or set aside a crypto wallet freezing order under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) of Schedule 1 must be made in writing and sent to the court before which the applicant wishes to make the application, and must specify the grounds on which it is made. (2) But if the applicant has been given a copy of an order under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) of Schedule 1 in respect of the crypto wallet which is the subject of the application, then the application must be sent to the court which sent the applicant the copy of that order. (3) Where the applicant is an enforcement officer, the applicant must send a copy of the application to the enforcement officer who applied for the crypto wallet freezing order, if that application was made by a different officer, and to every person to whom a copy of a previous related order made under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) or paragraph 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 was sent. (4) Where the applicant is a person other than an enforcement officer who is affected by the crypto wallet freezing order— (a) the court must send copies of the application to the enforcement officer who applied for the crypto wallet freezing order, and (b) the enforcement officer must send a copy of the application to every person to whom a copy of a previous related order made under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) or paragraph 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 was sent. (5) The court must fix a date for the hearing of the application, which, unless directed otherwise, must not be earlier than seven days from the date on which it is fixed. (6) Where the applicant is an enforcement officer— (a) the court must notify the date fixed for the hearing of the application under paragraph (5) to the applicant, and (b) the applicant must notify that date to every person to whom a copy of an order made under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) or 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 has been given. (7) Where the applicant is a person other than an enforcement officer who is affected by the crypto wallet freezing order— (a) the court must notify the date fixed for the hearing of the application under paragraph (5) to the applicant and to the enforcement officer who applied for the crypto wallet freezing order, and (b) the enforcement officer must notify that date to every person to whom a copy of an order made under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) or 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 has been given. (8) At the hearing of an application under paragraph 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1, the court may, if it thinks fit, order that the application be heard with any other relevant proceedings in relation to the crypto wallet which is the subject of an order under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) of Schedule 1. (9) Where the applicant is an enforcement officer— (a) the court must give copies of the order to the applicant, and (b) the applicant must send a copy of the order to— (i) every person to whom copies of the previous related orders have been sent, and (ii) any person other than one referred to in sub-paragraph (i) who is known to be affected by the order. (10) Where the applicant is a person other than an enforcement officer who is affected by the crypto wallet freezing order— (a) the court must give copies of the order to the applicant and to the enforcement officer who applied for the crypto wallet freezing order, and (b) the enforcement officer must give a copy of the order varying or setting aside the crypto wallet freezing order to the persons mentioned in sub-paragraphs (i) and (ii) of paragraph (9)(b).
10 Application for the variation or setting aside of a crypto wallet freezing order
(1) An application under paragraph 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 to vary or set aside a crypto wallet freezing order under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) of Schedule 1 must be made in writing and sent to the court before which the applicant wishes to make the application, and must specify the grounds on which it is made. (2) But if the applicant has been given a copy of an order under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) of Schedule 1 in respect of the crypto wallet which is the subject of the application, then the application must be sent to the court which sent the applicant the copy of that order. (3) Where the applicant is an enforcement officer, the applicant must send a copy of the application to the enforcement officer who applied for the crypto wallet freezing order, if that application was made by a different officer, and to every person to whom a copy of a previous related order made under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) or paragraph 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 was sent. (4) Where the applicant is a person other than an enforcement officer who is affected by the crypto wallet freezing order— (a) the court must send copies of the application to the enforcement officer who applied for the crypto wallet freezing order, and (b) the enforcement officer must send a copy of the application to every person to whom a copy of a previous related order made under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) or paragraph 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 was sent. (5) The court must fix a date for the hearing of the application, which, unless directed otherwise, must not be earlier than seven days from the date on which it is fixed. (6) Where the applicant is an enforcement officer— (a) the court must notify the date fixed for the hearing of the application under paragraph (5) to the applicant, and (b) the applicant must notify that date to every person to whom a copy of an order made under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) or 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 has been given. (7) Where the applicant is a person other than an enforcement officer who is affected by the crypto wallet freezing order— (a) the court must notify the date fixed for the hearing of the application under paragraph (5) to the applicant and to the enforcement officer who applied for the crypto wallet freezing order, and (b) the enforcement officer must notify that date to every person to whom a copy of an order made under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) or 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1 has been given. (8) At the hearing of an application under paragraph 10Z7BC(1) of Schedule 1, the court may, if it thinks fit, order that the application be heard with any other relevant proceedings in relation to the crypto wallet which is the subject of an order under paragraph 10Z7BB(2) of Schedule 1. (9) Where the applicant is an enforcement officer— (a) the court must give copies of the order to the applicant, and (b) the applicant must send a copy of the order to— (i) every person to whom copies of the previous related orders have been sent, and (ii) any person other than one referred to in sub-paragraph (i) who is known to be affected by the order. (10) Where the applicant is a person other than an enforcement officer who is affected by the crypto wallet freezing order— (a) the court must give copies of the order to the applicant and to the enforcement officer who applied for the crypto wallet freezing order, and (b) the enforcement officer must give a copy of the order varying or setting aside the crypto wallet freezing order to the persons mentioned in sub-paragraphs (i) and (ii) of paragraph (9)(b).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.