The Magistrates’ Courts (Detention, Freezing and Forfeiture of Terrorist Cryptoassets, and Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
23 Amendment of the Magistrates’ Courts (Detention and Forfeiture of Terrorist Cash) (No. 2) Rules 2001
(1) The Magistrates’ Courts (Detention and Forfeiture of Terrorist Cash) (No. 2) Rules 2001 are amended as follows. (2) In rule 3 (interpretation), after paragraph (ab), insert— (ac) “freezing order” means an order made under— (i) paragraph 10S(2) of Schedule 1 (account freezing orders); (ii) paragraph 10Z7BB(2) of Schedule 1 (crypto wallet freezing orders); (ad) “order for further detention” means an order made under— (i) paragraph 3(2) of Schedule 1 (further detention of seized cash); (ii) paragraph 10D(1) of Schedule 1 (further detention of seized property); (iii) paragraph 10Z7AC(1) or (4) of Schedule 1 (further detention of cryptoasset-related items); (iv) paragraph 10Z7AG(1) or (4) (further detention of cryptoassets); . (3) In rule 4 (first application for the further detention of seized cash)— (a) in paragraph (1A)— (i) in sub-paragraph (a), for “previous order made under paragraph 3(2) or 10D(1) of Schedule 1”, substitute “previous order for further detention”; (ii) in sub-paragraph (b), for “previous account freezing order under paragraph 10S(2) of Schedule 1”, substitute “previous freezing order”; (b) in paragraph (2), after “except where” insert “the application is made without notice or”; (c) in paragraph (3), after “shall” insert “, except where the application is made without notice,”. (4) In rule 7 (application for forfeiture of detained cash), in paragraph (1A)(b)— (a) in sub-paragraph (i), for “order made under paragraph 3(2) or 10D(1) of Schedule 1”, substitute “order for further detention”; (b) in sub-paragraph (ii), for “an account freezing order under paragraph 10S(2) of Schedule 1” substitute “a freezing order”.
23 Amendment of the Magistrates’ Courts (Detention and Forfeiture of Terrorist Cash) (No. 2) Rules 2001
(1) The Magistrates’ Courts (Detention and Forfeiture of Terrorist Cash) (No. 2) Rules 2001 are amended as follows. (2) In rule 3 (interpretation), after paragraph (ab), insert— (ac) “freezing order” means an order made under— (i) paragraph 10S(2) of Schedule 1 (account freezing orders); (ii) paragraph 10Z7BB(2) of Schedule 1 (crypto wallet freezing orders); (ad) “order for further detention” means an order made under— (i) paragraph 3(2) of Schedule 1 (further detention of seized cash); (ii) paragraph 10D(1) of Schedule 1 (further detention of seized property); (iii) paragraph 10Z7AC(1) or (4) of Schedule 1 (further detention of cryptoasset-related items); (iv) paragraph 10Z7AG(1) or (4) (further detention of cryptoassets); . (3) In rule 4 (first application for the further detention of seized cash)— (a) in paragraph (1A)— (i) in sub-paragraph (a), for “previous order made under paragraph 3(2) or 10D(1) of Schedule 1”, substitute “previous order for further detention”; (ii) in sub-paragraph (b), for “previous account freezing order under paragraph 10S(2) of Schedule 1”, substitute “previous freezing order”; (b) in paragraph (2), after “except where” insert “the application is made without notice or”; (c) in paragraph (3), after “shall” insert “, except where the application is made without notice,”. (4) In rule 7 (application for forfeiture of detained cash), in paragraph (1A)(b)— (a) in sub-paragraph (i), for “order made under paragraph 3(2) or 10D(1) of Schedule 1”, substitute “order for further detention”; (b) in sub-paragraph (ii), for “an account freezing order under paragraph 10S(2) of Schedule 1” substitute “a freezing order”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.