The Magistrates’ Courts (Detention, Freezing and Forfeiture of Terrorist Cryptoassets, and Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2024
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 First application for the further detention of a seized cryptoasset-related item
(1) The first application under Paragraph 10Z7AC(6) of Schedule 1 for an order under paragraph 10Z7AC(1) or (4) of Schedule 1 for the further detention of property seized under paragraph 10Z7AA of Schedule 1 must be made in writing and sent to the court before which the applicant wishes to make the application. (2) But where the reasonable grounds for suspicion which led to the seizure of property to which an application under paragraph 10Z7AC(6) of Schedule 1 relates are connected to— (a) the reasonable grounds for suspicion which led to the seizure of cash or other property to which a previous order for further detention relates, or (b) the reasonable grounds for suspicion which led to the making of a previous freezing order, then the application may be sent to any court which made a previous order listed in sub-paragraph (a) or (b). (3) Except where the application is made without notice or paragraph (4) or paragraph (7) applies, a copy of the written application and notification of the hearing of the application must be given by the applicant to the person from whom the cryptoasset-related item was seized. (4) Where a seized cryptoasset-related item is found in a means of unattended dispatch, such as an unattended letter, parcel or container, copies of the written application and notification of the hearing of the application must, unless the application is made without notice, be sent by the applicant to the sender and intended recipient of the means of unattended dispatch. (5) But where paragraph (4) applies the applicant is not required to send copies of the written application and notification of the hearing to a sender or intended recipient who cannot be identified. (6) Where paragraph (4) applies, the court must not decline to hear an application solely on the ground that it has not been proved that the sender and intended recipient have been given a copy of the written application and notification of the hearing. (7) Where an unattended cryptoasset-related item is seized (other than where it is found in a means of unattended dispatch) the applicant need not give a copy of the written application and notification of the hearing to any person. (8) The court must give copies of the order to the applicant. (9) The applicant must give a copy of the order to the person from whom the cryptoasset-related item was seized and to any other person known to be affected by the order.
3 First application for the further detention of a seized cryptoasset-related item
(1) The first application under Paragraph 10Z7AC(6) of Schedule 1 for an order under paragraph 10Z7AC(1) or (4) of Schedule 1 for the further detention of property seized under paragraph 10Z7AA of Schedule 1 must be made in writing and sent to the court before which the applicant wishes to make the application. (2) But where the reasonable grounds for suspicion which led to the seizure of property to which an application under paragraph 10Z7AC(6) of Schedule 1 relates are connected to— (a) the reasonable grounds for suspicion which led to the seizure of cash or other property to which a previous order for further detention relates, or (b) the reasonable grounds for suspicion which led to the making of a previous freezing order, then the application may be sent to any court which made a previous order listed in sub-paragraph (a) or (b). (3) Except where the application is made without notice or paragraph (4) or paragraph (7) applies, a copy of the written application and notification of the hearing of the application must be given by the applicant to the person from whom the cryptoasset-related item was seized. (4) Where a seized cryptoasset-related item is found in a means of unattended dispatch, such as an unattended letter, parcel or container, copies of the written application and notification of the hearing of the application must, unless the application is made without notice, be sent by the applicant to the sender and intended recipient of the means of unattended dispatch. (5) But where paragraph (4) applies the applicant is not required to send copies of the written application and notification of the hearing to a sender or intended recipient who cannot be identified. (6) Where paragraph (4) applies, the court must not decline to hear an application solely on the ground that it has not been proved that the sender and intended recipient have been given a copy of the written application and notification of the hearing. (7) Where an unattended cryptoasset-related item is seized (other than where it is found in a means of unattended dispatch) the applicant need not give a copy of the written application and notification of the hearing to any person. (8) The court must give copies of the order to the applicant. (9) The applicant must give a copy of the order to the person from whom the cryptoasset-related item was seized and to any other person known to be affected by the order.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.