Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
52 Compensation for damage by game.
(1) Subject to subsection (2) below, where the tenant of an agricultural holding has sustained damage to his crops from game, the right to kill and take which is vested neither in him nor in anyone claiming under him other than the landlord, and which the tenant has not permission in writing to kill, he shall be entitled to compensation from his landlord for the damage if it exceeds in amount the sum of 12 pence per hectare of the area over which it extends.
(2) Compensation shall not be recoverable under subsection (1) above, unless—
(a) notice in writing is given to the landlord as soon as is practicable after the damage was first observed by the tenant, and a reasonable opportunity is given to the landlord to inspect the damage—
(i) in the case of damage to a growing crop, before the crop is begun to be reaped, raised or consumed;
(ii) in the case of damage to a crop reaped or raised, before the crop is begun to be removed from the land; and
(b) notice in writing of the claim, together with the particulars thereof, is given to the landlord within 6 months of the giving of notice under paragraph (a) above.
(3) The amount of compensation payable under subsection (1) above shall, in default of agreement made after the damage has been suffered, be determined by the Land Court.
(4) Where the right to kill and take the game is vested in some person other than the landlord, the landlord shall be entitled to be indemnified by that other person against all claims for compensation under this section; and any question arising under this subsection shall be determined by the Land Court.
(5) In this section “game” means deer, pheasants, partridges, grouse and black game.
Your change, as a redline
52 Compensation for damage by game.
(1) Subject to subsection (2) below, where the tenant of an agricultural holding has sustained damage to his crops from game, the right to kill and take which is vested neither in him nor in anyone claiming under him other than the landlord, and which the tenant has not permission in writing to kill, he shall be entitled to compensation from his landlord for the damage if it exceeds in amount the sum of 12 pence per hectare of the area over which it extends.
(2) Compensation shall not be recoverable under subsection (1) above, unless—
(a) notice in writing is given to the landlord as soon as is practicable after the damage was first observed by the tenant, and a reasonable opportunity is given to the landlord to inspect the damage—
(i) in the case of damage to a growing crop, before the crop is begun to be reaped, raised or consumed;
(ii) in the case of damage to a crop reaped or raised, before the crop is begun to be removed from the land; and
(b) notice in writing of the claim, together with the particulars thereof, is given to the landlord within 6 months of the giving of notice under paragraph (a) above.
(3) The amount of compensation payable under subsection (1) above shall, in default of agreement made after the damage has been suffered, be determined by the Land Court.
(4) Where the right to kill and take the game is vested in some person other than the landlord, the landlord shall be entitled to be indemnified by that other person against all claims for compensation under this section; and any question arising under this subsection shall be determined by the Land Court.
(5) In this section “game” means deer, pheasants, partridges, grouse and black game.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.