Immigration Act 2016
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
63 Appeals within the United Kingdom: certification of human rights claims
(1) Section 94B of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (appeals from within the United Kingdom: certification of human rights claims made by persons liable to deportation) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) to (5). (2) In the heading omit “made by persons liable to deportation”. (3) In subsection (1) omit the words from “who is liable” to the end of paragraph (b). (4) In subsection (2) for the words from “removal” to “removed” substitute “ refusing P entry to, removing P from or requiring P to leave the United Kingdom ”. (5) In subsection (3) for the words from “removed” in the first place it appears to “removed” in the second place it appears substitute “ refused entry to, removed from or required to leave the United Kingdom ”. (6) In section 92(3)(a) of that Act (cases where human rights claim appeal must be brought from outside the United Kingdom) omit “made by persons liable to deportation”.
63 Appeals within the United Kingdom: certification of human rights claims
(1) Section 94B of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (appeals from within the United Kingdom: certification of human rights claims made by persons liable to deportation) is amended in accordance with subsections (2) to (5). (2) In the heading omit “made by persons liable to deportation”. (3) In subsection (1) omit the words from “who is liable” to the end of paragraph (b). (4) In subsection (2) for the words from “removal” to “removed” substitute “ refusing P entry to, removing P from or requiring P to leave the United Kingdom ”. (5) In subsection (3) for the words from “removed” in the first place it appears to “removed” in the second place it appears substitute “ refused entry to, removed from or required to leave the United Kingdom ”. (6) In section 92(3)(a) of that Act (cases where human rights claim appeal must be brought from outside the United Kingdom) omit “made by persons liable to deportation”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.