Propose a change

Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

47ZDB Applicable bail period: extension of limit in non-standard cases

(1) This section applies in relation to a person if— (a) the applicable bail period in relation to a person is the period mentioned in section 47ZB(1)(a), (b) that period has not ended, and (c) an appropriate decision-maker is satisfied that conditions A to D are met in relation to the person. (2) The appropriate decision-maker may authorise the applicable bail period in relation to the person to be extended so that it ends at the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the person’s bail start date. (3) Before determining whether to give an authorisation under subsection (2) in relation to a person, the appropriate decision-maker must arrange for the person or the person’s legal representative to be informed that a determination is to be made. (4) In determining whether to give an authorisation under subsection (2) in relation to a person, the appropriate decision-maker must consider any representations made by the person or the person’s legal representative. (5) The appropriate decision-maker must arrange for the person or the person’s legal representative to be informed whether an authorisation under subsection (2) has been given in relation to the person. (6) For the purposes of this Part “appropriate decision-maker” means— (a) in an FCA case, a member of staff of the Financial Conduct Authority who is of the description designated for the purposes of this section by the Chief Executive of that Authority, (b) in an HMRC case, an officer of Revenue and Customs of a grade that is equivalent to the rank of superintendent or above, (c) in an NCA case, a National Crime Agency officer of a grade that is equivalent to the rank of superintendent or above, and (d) in an SFO case, a member of the Serious Fraud Office who is of the Senior Civil Service.

Your change, as a redline

47ZDB Applicable bail period: extension of limit in non-standard cases

(1) This section applies in relation to a person if— (a) the applicable bail period in relation to a person is the period mentioned in section 47ZB(1)(a), (b) that period has not ended, and (c) an appropriate decision-maker is satisfied that conditions A to D are met in relation to the person. (2) The appropriate decision-maker may authorise the applicable bail period in relation to the person to be extended so that it ends at the end of the period of 12 months beginning with the person’s bail start date. (3) Before determining whether to give an authorisation under subsection (2) in relation to a person, the appropriate decision-maker must arrange for the person or the person’s legal representative to be informed that a determination is to be made. (4) In determining whether to give an authorisation under subsection (2) in relation to a person, the appropriate decision-maker must consider any representations made by the person or the person’s legal representative. (5) The appropriate decision-maker must arrange for the person or the person’s legal representative to be informed whether an authorisation under subsection (2) has been given in relation to the person. (6) For the purposes of this Part “appropriate decision-maker” means— (a) in an FCA case, a member of staff of the Financial Conduct Authority who is of the description designated for the purposes of this section by the Chief Executive of that Authority, (b) in an HMRC case, an officer of Revenue and Customs of a grade that is equivalent to the rank of superintendent or above, (c) in an NCA case, a National Crime Agency officer of a grade that is equivalent to the rank of superintendent or above, and (d) in an SFO case, a member of the Serious Fraud Office who is of the Senior Civil Service.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds