Propose a change

Highways Act 1980

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

105D Validity of decisions

(1) If a person aggrieved by a decision of the project authority to proceed with the construction or improvement for which an environmental statement has been made desires to question the validity of the decision on the ground that— (a) it is not within the powers of this Act; or (b) any requirement of this Part of this Act has not been complied with in relation to the decision; he may, within 6 weeks from the date on which the decision is first published under section 105B (6), make an application for the purpose to the High Court. (2) On any such application, the Court— (a) may by interim order suspend the operation of the decision, or any aspect of it, either generally or in so far as it affects any property of the applicant, until the final determination of the proceedings; and (b) if satisfied that the decision is not within the powers of this Act, or that the interests of the applicant have been substantially prejudiced by a failure to comply with any requirement of this Part of this Act, may quash the decision or any aspect of it, either generally or in so far as it affects any property of the applicant. (3) Subject to subsection (2), a decision to which subsection (1) applies shall not be questioned in any legal proceedings whatever.

Your change, as a redline

105D Validity of decisions

(1) If a person aggrieved by a decision of the project authority to proceed with the construction or improvement for which an environmental statement has been made desires to question the validity of the decision on the ground that— (a) it is not within the powers of this Act; or (b) any requirement of this Part of this Act has not been complied with in relation to the decision; he may, within 6 weeks from the date on which the decision is first published under section 105B (6), make an application for the purpose to the High Court. (2) On any such application, the Court— (a) may by interim order suspend the operation of the decision, or any aspect of it, either generally or in so far as it affects any property of the applicant, until the final determination of the proceedings; and (b) if satisfied that the decision is not within the powers of this Act, or that the interests of the applicant have been substantially prejudiced by a failure to comply with any requirement of this Part of this Act, may quash the decision or any aspect of it, either generally or in so far as it affects any property of the applicant. (3) Subject to subsection (2), a decision to which subsection (1) applies shall not be questioned in any legal proceedings whatever.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds