Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
72B Sections 72A and 72AA: supplementary
(1) The failure by a person to comply with any requirements of section 72A or 72AA of this Act, or of rules or regulations made under section 72A, may constitute misconduct for the purposes of section 80 of this Act, article 51(1)(a) of the Pharmacy Order 2010 and Article 20 of the Pharmacy (Northern Ireland) Order 1976 and the relevant disciplinary committee may deal with such a failure accordingly.
(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3) Subsection (4) of this section applies if a person—
(a) fails to comply with the requirements of subsection (2) of section 72A of this Act, or of rules or regulations made under that subsection,
(b) fails to comply with any requirements as to absence from the premises contained in rules or regulations made by virtue of subsection (7) of that section.
(4) If this subsection applies, the person in question is not to be considered while the failure continues as being in charge of the business carried on at or from the premises in question (or in a subsection (3)(a) case at any of them) for the purposes of sections 70 to 72 of this Act.
Your change, as a redline
72B Sections 72A and 72AA: supplementary
(1) The failure by a person to comply with any requirements of section 72A or 72AA of this Act, or of rules or regulations made under section 72A, may constitute misconduct for the purposes of section 80 of this Act, article 51(1)(a) of the Pharmacy Order 2010 and Article 20 of the Pharmacy (Northern Ireland) Order 1976 and the relevant disciplinary committee may deal with such a failure accordingly.
(2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(3) Subsection (4) of this section applies if a person—
(a) fails to comply with the requirements of subsection (2) of section 72A of this Act, or of rules or regulations made under that subsection,
(b) fails to comply with any requirements as to absence from the premises contained in rules or regulations made by virtue of subsection (7) of that section.
(4) If this subsection applies, the person in question is not to be considered while the failure continues as being in charge of the business carried on at or from the premises in question (or in a subsection (3)(a) case at any of them) for the purposes of sections 70 to 72 of this Act.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.