Propose a change

The Export Control (Amendment) Regulations 2026

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

18 Amendments to Annexes IIa, IIe, IIf and IIg to the Dual-Use Regulation

(1) Omit Annex IIa (Assimilated General Export Authorisation No 001) to the Dual-Use Regulation. (2) In Part 3 of Annex IIe (Assimilated General Export Authorisation No 005) to the Dual-Use Regulation, in paragraph 1(3), for “in Part 2 of Annex IIa” substitute “Canada, the Commonwealth of Australia, Japan, the Kingdom of Norway, New Zealand, the Swiss Confederation including the Principality of Liechtenstein or the United States of America”. (3) In Part 3 of Annex IIf (Assimilated General Export Authorisation No 006) to the Dual-Use Regulation, in paragraph 1(3), for “in Part 2 of Annex IIa” substitute “Canada, the Commonwealth of Australia, Japan, the Kingdom of Norway, New Zealand, the Swiss Confederation including the Principality of Liechtenstein or the United States of America”; (4) In Annex IIg (List referred to in Article 9(4)(a) of this Regulation and Annexes IIa, IIc and IId to this Regulation)— (a) in entry 0D001 for “‘ … ’” substitute “‘ use ’”; (b) in entry 0E001 for “‘ … ’” substitute “‘ use ’”.

Your change, as a redline

18 Amendments to Annexes IIa, IIe, IIf and IIg to the Dual-Use Regulation

(1) Omit Annex IIa (Assimilated General Export Authorisation No 001) to the Dual-Use Regulation. (2) In Part 3 of Annex IIe (Assimilated General Export Authorisation No 005) to the Dual-Use Regulation, in paragraph 1(3), for “in Part 2 of Annex IIa” substitute “Canada, the Commonwealth of Australia, Japan, the Kingdom of Norway, New Zealand, the Swiss Confederation including the Principality of Liechtenstein or the United States of America”. (3) In Part 3 of Annex IIf (Assimilated General Export Authorisation No 006) to the Dual-Use Regulation, in paragraph 1(3), for “in Part 2 of Annex IIa” substitute “Canada, the Commonwealth of Australia, Japan, the Kingdom of Norway, New Zealand, the Swiss Confederation including the Principality of Liechtenstein or the United States of America”; (4) In Annex IIg (List referred to in Article 9(4)(a) of this Regulation and Annexes IIa, IIc and IId to this Regulation)— (a) in entry 0D001 for “‘ … ’” substitute “‘ use ’”; (b) in entry 0E001 for “‘ … ’” substitute “‘ use ’”.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds