Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1992
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
18 Consequential amendments, repeals and saving.
(1) The enactments specified in Schedule 3 shall have effect subject to the amendments there specified, being amendments consequential on this Act. (2) The enactments specified in Part I of Schedule 4 are hereby repealed to the extent specified in the third column of that Part; and the orders specified in Part II of that Schedule are hereby revoked. (3) Notwithstanding the repeal by this Act of Schedule 3 to the Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1971, section 3(12)(a) of the Lands Tribunal Act 1949 shall continue to have effect with the substitution for paragraph (a) of the following paragraph— (a) Subsection (4) of this section shall not apply; .
18 Consequential amendments, repeals and saving.
(1) The enactments specified in Schedule 3 shall have effect subject to the amendments there specified, being amendments consequential on this Act. (2) The enactments specified in Part I of Schedule 4 are hereby repealed to the extent specified in the third column of that Part; and the orders specified in Part II of that Schedule are hereby revoked. (3) Notwithstanding the repeal by this Act of Schedule 3 to the Tribunals and Inquiries Act 1971, section 3(12)(a) of the Lands Tribunal Act 1949 shall continue to have effect with the substitution for paragraph (a) of the following paragraph— (a) Subsection (4) of this section shall not apply; .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.