The Trade Unions (Right to Access Workplaces) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
26 Penalty amount - matters to which the CAC must have regard
(1) When considering what amount is payable under an order requiring a person to pay an amount to the CAC under section 70ZI(5)(b) of the 1992 Act in relation to an access agreement, the CAC must have regard to the following matters— (a) the gravity of the failure; (b) the period of time over which that failure occurred; (c) the reason for that failure; (d) the number of workers affected by that failure; (e) the size and resources of the person; and (f) whether there have been any previous failures by the person to comply with any requirements under any access agreement entered into under section 70ZD of the 1992 Act or treated as having been entered into under section 70ZE of the 1992 Act. (2) Where the person described in paragraph (1) is a party to that access agreement the failure referred to in paragraph (1)(a) is the failure to comply with either or both of the following— (a) that access agreement; (b) any order made by the CAC under section 70ZH(3)(c) of the 1992 Act requiring that person to take specified steps for the purposes of ensuring that access takes place in accordance with that agreement. (3) Where the person described in paragraph (1) is not a party to that access agreement, and was the subject of the initial complaint made under section 70ZH(1)(b) of the 1992 Act in relation to that access agreement, the failure referred to in paragraph (1)(a) is the failure to do either or both of the following— (a) enable access, by taking steps to prevent access or otherwise preventing access from taking place in accordance with that access agreement; (b) comply with any order made by the CAC under section 70ZH(3)(c) of the 1992 Act requiring that person to take specified steps for the purposes of ensuring that access takes place in accordance with that access agreement.
26 Penalty amount - matters to which the CAC must have regard
(1) When considering what amount is payable under an order requiring a person to pay an amount to the CAC under section 70ZI(5)(b) of the 1992 Act in relation to an access agreement, the CAC must have regard to the following matters— (a) the gravity of the failure; (b) the period of time over which that failure occurred; (c) the reason for that failure; (d) the number of workers affected by that failure; (e) the size and resources of the person; and (f) whether there have been any previous failures by the person to comply with any requirements under any access agreement entered into under section 70ZD of the 1992 Act or treated as having been entered into under section 70ZE of the 1992 Act. (2) Where the person described in paragraph (1) is a party to that access agreement the failure referred to in paragraph (1)(a) is the failure to comply with either or both of the following— (a) that access agreement; (b) any order made by the CAC under section 70ZH(3)(c) of the 1992 Act requiring that person to take specified steps for the purposes of ensuring that access takes place in accordance with that agreement. (3) Where the person described in paragraph (1) is not a party to that access agreement, and was the subject of the initial complaint made under section 70ZH(1)(b) of the 1992 Act in relation to that access agreement, the failure referred to in paragraph (1)(a) is the failure to do either or both of the following— (a) enable access, by taking steps to prevent access or otherwise preventing access from taking place in accordance with that access agreement; (b) comply with any order made by the CAC under section 70ZH(3)(c) of the 1992 Act requiring that person to take specified steps for the purposes of ensuring that access takes place in accordance with that access agreement.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.