Nuclear Material (Offences) Act 1983
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
4 Amendments of other Acts.
(1) In consequence of the provisions of this Act— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) in subsections (4) and (5) of section 4 of the Suppression of Terrorism Act 1978 (which also relates to certain offences committed outside the United Kingdom) after the words “Internationally Protected Persons Act 1978” there shall be inserted in each place the words “ and the Nuclear Material (Offences) Act 1983 ”. (2) In the Schedule to the Visiting Forces Act 1952 (which specifies the offences which are offences against the person and against property for the purposes of section 3 of that Act)— (a) at the end of each of paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 there shall be inserted the following subparagraph— (c) an offence under section 2 of the Nuclear Material (Offences) Act 1983, where the circumstances are that— (i) in the case of a contravention of subsection (2), the act falling within paragraph (a) or (b) of that subsection would, had it been done, have constituted an offence falling within subparagraph (a) or (b) of this paragraph, or (ii) in the case of a contravention of subsection (3) or (4), the act threatened would, had it been done, have constituted such an offence ; and (b) at the end of paragraph 3 there shall be inserted the following subparagraph— (c) an offence under section 2 of the Nuclear Material (Offences) Act 1983, where the circumstances are that— (i) in the case of a contravention of subsection (2), the act falling within paragraph (a) or (b) of that subsection would, had it been done, have constituted an offence falling within the foregoing subparagraphs, or (ii) in the case of a contravention of subsection (3) or (4), the act threatened would, had it been done, have constituted such an offence. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 Amendments of other Acts.
(1) In consequence of the provisions of this Act— (a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) in subsections (4) and (5) of section 4 of the Suppression of Terrorism Act 1978 (which also relates to certain offences committed outside the United Kingdom) after the words “Internationally Protected Persons Act 1978” there shall be inserted in each place the words “ and the Nuclear Material (Offences) Act 1983 ”. (2) In the Schedule to the Visiting Forces Act 1952 (which specifies the offences which are offences against the person and against property for the purposes of section 3 of that Act)— (a) at the end of each of paragraphs 1, 2 and 4 there shall be inserted the following subparagraph— (c) an offence under section 2 of the Nuclear Material (Offences) Act 1983, where the circumstances are that— (i) in the case of a contravention of subsection (2), the act falling within paragraph (a) or (b) of that subsection would, had it been done, have constituted an offence falling within subparagraph (a) or (b) of this paragraph, or (ii) in the case of a contravention of subsection (3) or (4), the act threatened would, had it been done, have constituted such an offence ; and (b) at the end of paragraph 3 there shall be inserted the following subparagraph— (c) an offence under section 2 of the Nuclear Material (Offences) Act 1983, where the circumstances are that— (i) in the case of a contravention of subsection (2), the act falling within paragraph (a) or (b) of that subsection would, had it been done, have constituted an offence falling within the foregoing subparagraphs, or (ii) in the case of a contravention of subsection (3) or (4), the act threatened would, had it been done, have constituted such an offence. (3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.