Propose a change

The Public Service Pension Schemes (Rectification of Unlawful Discrimination) (Tax) Regulations 2026

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

11 AFPS 2005: election for new scheme benefits

(1) This regulation applies where— (a) Part 4 of Schedule 3 to the 2005 Order applies to or in respect of an individual in accordance with paragraph 18 of that Part; (b) a section 6 election is made in relation to an individual’s remediable service under the AFPS 2005; and (c) as a result of that election, benefits which are equivalent to AFPS 1975 benefits are payable in relation to that individual’s earlier service from the AFPS 2005 (“AFPS 1975 equivalent benefits”) in accordance with paragraph 19 of Part 4 of Schedule 3 to the 2005 Order. (2) The normal minimum pension age in relation to AFPS 1975 equivalent benefits is treated as being the protected pension age which would have applied to that individual in relation to the AFPS 1975 under paragraph 22 of Schedule 36 to FA 2004, disregarding the operation of Part 4 of Schedule 3 to the 2005 Order.

Your change, as a redline

11 AFPS 2005: election for new scheme benefits

(1) This regulation applies where— (a) Part 4 of Schedule 3 to the 2005 Order applies to or in respect of an individual in accordance with paragraph 18 of that Part; (b) a section 6 election is made in relation to an individual’s remediable service under the AFPS 2005; and (c) as a result of that election, benefits which are equivalent to AFPS 1975 benefits are payable in relation to that individual’s earlier service from the AFPS 2005 (“AFPS 1975 equivalent benefits”) in accordance with paragraph 19 of Part 4 of Schedule 3 to the 2005 Order. (2) The normal minimum pension age in relation to AFPS 1975 equivalent benefits is treated as being the protected pension age which would have applied to that individual in relation to the AFPS 1975 under paragraph 22 of Schedule 36 to FA 2004, disregarding the operation of Part 4 of Schedule 3 to the 2005 Order.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds