Propose a change

Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

274 Relationship between rules prohibiting and allowing deductions

(1) Any relevant permissive rule in this Part— (a) has priority over any relevant prohibitive rule in this Part, but (b) is subject to— (i) section 36 (unpaid remuneration), as applied by section 272, (ii) section 38 (employee benefit contributions), as applied by sections 272 and 272ZA, (iii) section 48 (car hire), as applied by section 272, (iv) section 55 (crime-related payments), as applied by sections 272 and 272ZA, (v) section 272A (finance costs), and (vi) section 307D (cash basis: modification of deduction for costs of loans). (1A) But, if the relevant permissive rule would allow a deduction in calculating the profits of a property business in respect of an amount which arises directly or indirectly in consequence of, or otherwise in connection with, relevant tax avoidance arrangements, that rule— (a) does not have priority under subsection (1)(a), and (b) is subject to any relevant prohibitive rule in this Part (and to the provisions mentioned in subsection (1)(b)). (2) In this section “any relevant permissive rule in this Part” means any provision of this Part (apart from sections 291 to 294) which allows a deduction in calculating the profits of a property business. (3) In this section “any relevant prohibitive rule in this Part”, in relation to any deduction, means any provision of this Part (apart from sections 36, 38, 48 and 55, as applied by section 272 , or sections 38 and 55 as applied by section 272ZA , and apart also from sections 272A and 307D) which might otherwise be read as— (a) prohibiting the deduction, or (b) restricting the amount of the deduction. (3A) In this section “relevant tax avoidance arrangements” means arrangements— (a) to which the person carrying on the property business is a party, and (b) the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of which is the obtaining of a tax advantage (within the meaning of section 1139 of CTA 2010). “Arrangements” includes any agreement, understanding, scheme, transaction or series of transactions (whether or not legally enforceable). (4) In this section any reference to any provision of this Part includes any provision applied by section 272 or 272ZA.

Your change, as a redline

274 Relationship between rules prohibiting and allowing deductions

(1) Any relevant permissive rule in this Part— (a) has priority over any relevant prohibitive rule in this Part, but (b) is subject to— (i) section 36 (unpaid remuneration), as applied by section 272, (ii) section 38 (employee benefit contributions), as applied by sections 272 and 272ZA, (iii) section 48 (car hire), as applied by section 272, (iv) section 55 (crime-related payments), as applied by sections 272 and 272ZA, (v) section 272A (finance costs), and (vi) section 307D (cash basis: modification of deduction for costs of loans). (1A) But, if the relevant permissive rule would allow a deduction in calculating the profits of a property business in respect of an amount which arises directly or indirectly in consequence of, or otherwise in connection with, relevant tax avoidance arrangements, that rule— (a) does not have priority under subsection (1)(a), and (b) is subject to any relevant prohibitive rule in this Part (and to the provisions mentioned in subsection (1)(b)). (2) In this section “any relevant permissive rule in this Part” means any provision of this Part (apart from sections 291 to 294) which allows a deduction in calculating the profits of a property business. (3) In this section “any relevant prohibitive rule in this Part”, in relation to any deduction, means any provision of this Part (apart from sections 36, 38, 48 and 55, as applied by section 272 , or sections 38 and 55 as applied by section 272ZA , and apart also from sections 272A and 307D) which might otherwise be read as— (a) prohibiting the deduction, or (b) restricting the amount of the deduction. (3A) In this section “relevant tax avoidance arrangements” means arrangements— (a) to which the person carrying on the property business is a party, and (b) the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, of which is the obtaining of a tax advantage (within the meaning of section 1139 of CTA 2010). “Arrangements” includes any agreement, understanding, scheme, transaction or series of transactions (whether or not legally enforceable). (4) In this section any reference to any provision of this Part includes any provision applied by section 272 or 272ZA.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds