Propose a change

Communications Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

128 Notification of misuse of networks and services

(1) Where OFCOM determine that there are reasonable grounds for believing that a person has persistently misused an electronic communications network or electronic communications services, they may give that person a notification under this section. (2) A notification under this section is one which— (a) sets out the determination made by OFCOM; (b) specifies the use that OFCOM consider constitutes persistent misuse; and (c) specifies the period during which the person notified has an opportunity of making representations about the matters notified. (3) That period must not be less than the following— (a) in an urgent case, seven days; and (b) in any other case, one month. (4) A case is an urgent case for the purposes of subsection (3) if OFCOM consider— (a) that the misuse in question is continuing; and (b) that the harm it causes makes it necessary for it to be stopped as soon as possible. (5) For the purposes of this Chapter a person misuses an electronic communications network or electronic communications service if— (a) the effect or likely effect of his use of the network or service is to cause another person unnecessarily to suffer annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety; or (b) he uses the network or service to engage in conduct the effect or likely effect of which is to cause another person unnecessarily to suffer annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety. (6) For the purposes of this Chapter the cases in which a person is to be treated as persistently misusing a network or service include any case in which his misuse is repeated on a sufficient number of occasions for it to be clear that the misuse represents— (a) a pattern of behaviour or practice; or (b) recklessness as to whether persons suffer annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety. (7) For the purpose of determining whether misuse on a number of different occasions constitutes persistent misuse for the purposes of this Chapter, each of the following is immaterial— (a) that the misuse was in relation to a network on some occasions and in relation to a service on others; (b) that different networks or services were involved on different occasions; and (c) that the persons who were or were likely to suffer annoyance inconvenience or anxiety were different on different occasions. (8) If he considers that appropriate alternative means of dealing with it exists, the Secretary of State may by order provide that a use of a description specified in the order is not to be treated for the purposes of this Chapter as a misuse of an electronic communications network or electronic communications service.

Your change, as a redline

128 Notification of misuse of networks and services

(1) Where OFCOM determine that there are reasonable grounds for believing that a person has persistently misused an electronic communications network or electronic communications services, they may give that person a notification under this section. (2) A notification under this section is one which— (a) sets out the determination made by OFCOM; (b) specifies the use that OFCOM consider constitutes persistent misuse; and (c) specifies the period during which the person notified has an opportunity of making representations about the matters notified. (3) That period must not be less than the following— (a) in an urgent case, seven days; and (b) in any other case, one month. (4) A case is an urgent case for the purposes of subsection (3) if OFCOM consider— (a) that the misuse in question is continuing; and (b) that the harm it causes makes it necessary for it to be stopped as soon as possible. (5) For the purposes of this Chapter a person misuses an electronic communications network or electronic communications service if— (a) the effect or likely effect of his use of the network or service is to cause another person unnecessarily to suffer annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety; or (b) he uses the network or service to engage in conduct the effect or likely effect of which is to cause another person unnecessarily to suffer annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety. (6) For the purposes of this Chapter the cases in which a person is to be treated as persistently misusing a network or service include any case in which his misuse is repeated on a sufficient number of occasions for it to be clear that the misuse represents— (a) a pattern of behaviour or practice; or (b) recklessness as to whether persons suffer annoyance, inconvenience or anxiety. (7) For the purpose of determining whether misuse on a number of different occasions constitutes persistent misuse for the purposes of this Chapter, each of the following is immaterial— (a) that the misuse was in relation to a network on some occasions and in relation to a service on others; (b) that different networks or services were involved on different occasions; and (c) that the persons who were or were likely to suffer annoyance inconvenience or anxiety were different on different occasions. (8) If he considers that appropriate alternative means of dealing with it exists, the Secretary of State may by order provide that a use of a description specified in the order is not to be treated for the purposes of this Chapter as a misuse of an electronic communications network or electronic communications service.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds