Propose a change

Communications Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

186 Action by OFCOM on dispute reference

(1) This section applies where a dispute is referred to OFCOM under and in accordance with section 185. (2) OFCOM must decide whether or not it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute. (2A) In relation to a dispute falling within subsection 185(1), OFCOM may in particular take into account their priorities and available resources in considering whether it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute. (3) In relation to a dispute falling within section 185(1A) or (2), Unless they consider— (a) that there are alternative means available for resolving the dispute, (b) that a resolution of the dispute by those means would be consistent with the six requirements set out in section 4, and (c) that a prompt and satisfactory resolution of the dispute is likely if those alternative means are used for resolving it, their decision must be a decision that it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute. (4) As soon as reasonably practicable after OFCOM have decided— (a) that it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute, or (b) that it is not, they must inform each of the parties to the dispute of their decision and of their reasons for it. (5) The notification must state the date of the decision. (6) In relation to a dispute falling within section 185(1A) or (2), Where— (a) OFCOM decide that it is not appropriate for them to handle the dispute, but (b) the dispute is not resolved by other means before the end of the four months after the day of OFCOM’s decision, the dispute may be referred back to OFCOM by one or more of the parties to the dispute.

Your change, as a redline

186 Action by OFCOM on dispute reference

(1) This section applies where a dispute is referred to OFCOM under and in accordance with section 185. (2) OFCOM must decide whether or not it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute. (2A) In relation to a dispute falling within subsection 185(1), OFCOM may in particular take into account their priorities and available resources in considering whether it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute. (3) In relation to a dispute falling within section 185(1A) or (2), Unless they consider— (a) that there are alternative means available for resolving the dispute, (b) that a resolution of the dispute by those means would be consistent with the six requirements set out in section 4, and (c) that a prompt and satisfactory resolution of the dispute is likely if those alternative means are used for resolving it, their decision must be a decision that it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute. (4) As soon as reasonably practicable after OFCOM have decided— (a) that it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute, or (b) that it is not, they must inform each of the parties to the dispute of their decision and of their reasons for it. (5) The notification must state the date of the decision. (6) In relation to a dispute falling within section 185(1A) or (2), Where— (a) OFCOM decide that it is not appropriate for them to handle the dispute, but (b) the dispute is not resolved by other means before the end of the four months after the day of OFCOM’s decision, the dispute may be referred back to OFCOM by one or more of the parties to the dispute.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds