Propose a change

Communications Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

191 OFCOM’s power to require information in connection with dispute

(1) Where a dispute has been referred or referred back to OFCOM under this Chapter, they may require any person to whom subsection (2) applies to provide them with all such information as they may require for the purpose of— (a) deciding whether it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute; or (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) considering the dispute and making a determination for resolving it. (2) This subsection applies to— (a) a party to the dispute; and (b) a person who is not a party to the dispute but appears to OFCOM to have information that is relevant to the matters mentioned in subsection (1)(a) to (c). (3) A person required to provide information under this section must provide it in such manner and within such reasonable period as may be specified by OFCOM. (4) In fixing the period within which information is to be provided in accordance with a requirement under this section OFCOM must have regard, in particular, to— (a) their obligation to make a determination for resolving the dispute within the period specified in section 188; (b) the nature of the dispute; and (c) the information that is required. (5) Sections 138 to 144 apply for the enforcement of a requirement under this section as they apply for the enforcement of requirements under section 135 or 136. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Your change, as a redline

191 OFCOM’s power to require information in connection with dispute

(1) Where a dispute has been referred or referred back to OFCOM under this Chapter, they may require any person to whom subsection (2) applies to provide them with all such information as they may require for the purpose of— (a) deciding whether it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute; or (b) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) considering the dispute and making a determination for resolving it. (2) This subsection applies to— (a) a party to the dispute; and (b) a person who is not a party to the dispute but appears to OFCOM to have information that is relevant to the matters mentioned in subsection (1)(a) to (c). (3) A person required to provide information under this section must provide it in such manner and within such reasonable period as may be specified by OFCOM. (4) In fixing the period within which information is to be provided in accordance with a requirement under this section OFCOM must have regard, in particular, to— (a) their obligation to make a determination for resolving the dispute within the period specified in section 188; (b) the nature of the dispute; and (c) the information that is required. (5) Sections 138 to 144 apply for the enforcement of a requirement under this section as they apply for the enforcement of requirements under section 135 or 136. (6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds