Propose a change

Communications Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

362AT References of disputes to OFCOM

(1) This section applies in the case of a dispute between the provider of a designated internet programme service and the provider of a regulated television selection service about— (a) the arrangements that should be made between them in order to give effect to the prominence duties that relate to them, or (b) the operation of arrangements made between them in order to give effect to those duties. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)— (a) the prominence duties relating to the provider of a designated internet programme service are— (i) in the case of a provider other than the BBC, the duties under section 362AJ; (ii) in the case of the BBC, any duties of the BBC under the BBC Charter and Agreement that are comparable to the duties of other providers under section 362AJ; (b) the prominence duties relating to the provider of a regulated television selection service are the duties under sections 362AK and 362AO(1). (3) Any one or more of the parties to the dispute may refer it to OFCOM but only if (and when) there is no realistic prospect of resolving the dispute without referring it. (4) OFCOM may invite any one or more of the parties to the dispute to make a reference under subsection (3). (5) OFCOM— (a) may impose requirements about the manner in which a reference must be made by publishing a notice setting out those requirements, (b) may withdraw or modify any requirements that have been imposed by publishing a further notice, and (c) in exercising their powers under paragraph (a) or (b), may make different provision for different cases. (6) OFCOM may publish a notice under subsection (5) in such ways as they consider appropriate for bringing the notice to the attention of those who, in their opinion, are likely to be affected by it.

Your change, as a redline

362AT References of disputes to OFCOM

(1) This section applies in the case of a dispute between the provider of a designated internet programme service and the provider of a regulated television selection service about— (a) the arrangements that should be made between them in order to give effect to the prominence duties that relate to them, or (b) the operation of arrangements made between them in order to give effect to those duties. (2) For the purposes of subsection (1)— (a) the prominence duties relating to the provider of a designated internet programme service are— (i) in the case of a provider other than the BBC, the duties under section 362AJ; (ii) in the case of the BBC, any duties of the BBC under the BBC Charter and Agreement that are comparable to the duties of other providers under section 362AJ; (b) the prominence duties relating to the provider of a regulated television selection service are the duties under sections 362AK and 362AO(1). (3) Any one or more of the parties to the dispute may refer it to OFCOM but only if (and when) there is no realistic prospect of resolving the dispute without referring it. (4) OFCOM may invite any one or more of the parties to the dispute to make a reference under subsection (3). (5) OFCOM— (a) may impose requirements about the manner in which a reference must be made by publishing a notice setting out those requirements, (b) may withdraw or modify any requirements that have been imposed by publishing a further notice, and (c) in exercising their powers under paragraph (a) or (b), may make different provision for different cases. (6) OFCOM may publish a notice under subsection (5) in such ways as they consider appropriate for bringing the notice to the attention of those who, in their opinion, are likely to be affected by it.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds