Propose a change

Communications Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

362AU Action by OFCOM on reference of dispute

(1) This section applies where— (a) a dispute is referred to OFCOM under section 362AT(3), and (b) any requirements imposed by OFCOM under section 362AT(5) are met in relation to the reference. (2) OFCOM must decide whether or not it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute. (3) Subsection (4) applies where— (a) the dispute is of the kind described in section 362AT(1)(a) (disputes between the provider of a designated internet programme service and the provider of a regulated television selection service about the arrangements that should be made between them for the purposes of their prominence duties), and (b) unless the dispute is resolved, it is highly likely that the designated internet programme service will— (i) not be included in the regulated television selection service, or (ii) not be given the appropriate degree of prominence within it. (4) OFCOM must decide that it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute unless they consider— (a) that there are alternative means available for resolving the dispute, (b) that a resolution by those means is likely to result in an outcome that is consistent with the agreement objectives, and (c) that a prompt and satisfactory resolution of the dispute is likely if those alternative means are used. (5) As soon as reasonably practicable after OFCOM have decided whether or not it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute, they must inform each of the parties to the dispute of— (a) their decision and the date on which it was made, and (b) their reasons for it. (6) Where OFCOM decide that it is not appropriate for them to handle the dispute, the dispute may subsequently be referred back to OFCOM by one or more of the parties if— (a) the parties have used alternative means for resolving the dispute but it has not been resolved within a reasonable period of time, or (b) the parties have not used alternative means for resolving the dispute but OFCOM consider that there is a satisfactory explanation for that.

Your change, as a redline

362AU Action by OFCOM on reference of dispute

(1) This section applies where— (a) a dispute is referred to OFCOM under section 362AT(3), and (b) any requirements imposed by OFCOM under section 362AT(5) are met in relation to the reference. (2) OFCOM must decide whether or not it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute. (3) Subsection (4) applies where— (a) the dispute is of the kind described in section 362AT(1)(a) (disputes between the provider of a designated internet programme service and the provider of a regulated television selection service about the arrangements that should be made between them for the purposes of their prominence duties), and (b) unless the dispute is resolved, it is highly likely that the designated internet programme service will— (i) not be included in the regulated television selection service, or (ii) not be given the appropriate degree of prominence within it. (4) OFCOM must decide that it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute unless they consider— (a) that there are alternative means available for resolving the dispute, (b) that a resolution by those means is likely to result in an outcome that is consistent with the agreement objectives, and (c) that a prompt and satisfactory resolution of the dispute is likely if those alternative means are used. (5) As soon as reasonably practicable after OFCOM have decided whether or not it is appropriate for them to handle the dispute, they must inform each of the parties to the dispute of— (a) their decision and the date on which it was made, and (b) their reasons for it. (6) Where OFCOM decide that it is not appropriate for them to handle the dispute, the dispute may subsequently be referred back to OFCOM by one or more of the parties if— (a) the parties have used alternative means for resolving the dispute but it has not been resolved within a reasonable period of time, or (b) the parties have not used alternative means for resolving the dispute but OFCOM consider that there is a satisfactory explanation for that.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds