Communications Act 2003
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
368HG Tier 1 standards code: special impartiality requirements
(1) The impartiality requirements referred to in section 368HF(2)(e) are— (a) the exclusion from programmes included in any Tier 1 services of all expressions of the views or opinions of the person providing that service on— (i) matters of political or industrial controversy, or (ii) matters relating to current public policy; (b) the preservation of due impartiality on the part of the person providing the service as respects those matters. (2) Subsection (1)(a) does not require the exclusion of expressions of views or opinions relating to the provision of on-demand programme services or non-UK on-demand programme services. (3) A code under section 368HF must make provision about the application of the requirement in subsection (1)(b), including provision about the ways in which the requirement may be met.
368HG Tier 1 standards code: special impartiality requirements
(1) The impartiality requirements referred to in section 368HF(2)(e) are— (a) the exclusion from programmes included in any Tier 1 services of all expressions of the views or opinions of the person providing that service on— (i) matters of political or industrial controversy, or (ii) matters relating to current public policy; (b) the preservation of due impartiality on the part of the person providing the service as respects those matters. (2) Subsection (1)(a) does not require the exclusion of expressions of views or opinions relating to the provision of on-demand programme services or non-UK on-demand programme services. (3) A code under section 368HF must make provision about the application of the requirement in subsection (1)(b), including provision about the ways in which the requirement may be met.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.