Propose a change

Communications Act 2003

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

70 Review of compliance costs: universal service conditions

(1) OFCOM may from time to time review the extent (if any) of the financial burden for a particular designated universal service provider of complying in relation to any matter with any one or more of the universal service conditions applied to him. (2) Where— (a) regulations under section 66 require the financial burden of so complying to be taken into account in determining whom to designate, and (b) the regulations provide for a particular method of calculating that burden to be used for the purposes of that determination, that must be the method of calculation applied on a review under this section. (3) Where subsection (2) does not apply, the financial burden of so complying is to be taken to be the amount calculated by OFCOM to be the net cost of compliance after allowing for market benefits accruing to the designated universal service provider from— (a) his designation; and (b) the application to him of universal service conditions. (4) After carrying out a review under this section OFCOM must either— (a) cause the calculations made by them on the review to be audited by a person who appears to them to be independent of designated universal service providers; or (b) themselves carry out an audit of those calculations. (5) OFCOM must ensure, in the case of every audit carried out under subsection (4), that a report on the audit— (a) is prepared; and (b) if not prepared by OFCOM, is provided to them. (6) It shall be the duty of OFCOM, in the case of every review under this section, to publish— (a) their conclusions on the review; and (b) a summary of the report of the audit which was carried out as respects the calculations made for the purposes of that review. (7) The publication of anything under subsection (6) must be a publication in such manner as OFCOM consider appropriate for bringing it to the attention of the persons who, in their opinion, are likely to be affected by it.

Your change, as a redline

70 Review of compliance costs: universal service conditions

(1) OFCOM may from time to time review the extent (if any) of the financial burden for a particular designated universal service provider of complying in relation to any matter with any one or more of the universal service conditions applied to him. (2) Where— (a) regulations under section 66 require the financial burden of so complying to be taken into account in determining whom to designate, and (b) the regulations provide for a particular method of calculating that burden to be used for the purposes of that determination, that must be the method of calculation applied on a review under this section. (3) Where subsection (2) does not apply, the financial burden of so complying is to be taken to be the amount calculated by OFCOM to be the net cost of compliance after allowing for market benefits accruing to the designated universal service provider from— (a) his designation; and (b) the application to him of universal service conditions. (4) After carrying out a review under this section OFCOM must either— (a) cause the calculations made by them on the review to be audited by a person who appears to them to be independent of designated universal service providers; or (b) themselves carry out an audit of those calculations. (5) OFCOM must ensure, in the case of every audit carried out under subsection (4), that a report on the audit— (a) is prepared; and (b) if not prepared by OFCOM, is provided to them. (6) It shall be the duty of OFCOM, in the case of every review under this section, to publish— (a) their conclusions on the review; and (b) a summary of the report of the audit which was carried out as respects the calculations made for the purposes of that review. (7) The publication of anything under subsection (6) must be a publication in such manner as OFCOM consider appropriate for bringing it to the attention of the persons who, in their opinion, are likely to be affected by it.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds