Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3513/92 of 3 December 1992 concerning the classification of certain goods in the combined nomenclature
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
ANNEX
Description of goods Classification CN code Reasons (1) (2) (3) 1. Prepared oil in gelatin capsules put up for retail sale. 1517 90 99 The classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 on the intepretation of the combined nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 1517, 1517 90 and 1517 90 99. Each capsule contains: — oil from the seeds of the common evening primrose (Oenothera biennis L) 500 mg — liquid milk fat 14 mg — antioxydant (vitamine E) 15 mg 2. Colourless, transparent sweet invert sugar syrup with no detectable fruit flavour, showing the following properties on analyses: 1702 90 90 The classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 on the interpretation of the combined nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 1702, 1702 90 and 1702 90 90. The removal of virtually all elements except sugars means the product no longer has the character of concentrated grape must of CN code 2009 60. — Extract refr. 20oC 67,0 by weight — Sucrose undetectable — Glucose (dextrose) 48,0 by weight in the dry state — Fructose: 48,8 by weight in the dry state — Ash: less than 0,01 % by weight — Titratable acids (pH 7,0) as tartaric acid 0,11 % by weight The trade description of this product is ‘rectified grape must concentrate’. 3. Carrot juice which has been subjected to lactic fermentation, ready for consumption as a beverage 2202 90 10 Classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 2202, 2202 90 and 2202 90 10. The product has a lower Ph value following lactic fermentation resulting in the product losing its original character as a vegetable juice of heading 2009 (see also the Explanatory Notes to the HS, heading 2009, paragraphs 3 and 7).
ANNEX
Description of goods Classification CN code Reasons (1) (2) (3) 1. Prepared oil in gelatin capsules put up for retail sale. 1517 90 99 The classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 on the intepretation of the combined nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 1517, 1517 90 and 1517 90 99. Each capsule contains: — oil from the seeds of the common evening primrose (Oenothera biennis L) 500 mg — liquid milk fat 14 mg — antioxydant (vitamine E) 15 mg 2. Colourless, transparent sweet invert sugar syrup with no detectable fruit flavour, showing the following properties on analyses: 1702 90 90 The classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 on the interpretation of the combined nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 1702, 1702 90 and 1702 90 90. The removal of virtually all elements except sugars means the product no longer has the character of concentrated grape must of CN code 2009 60. — Extract refr. 20oC 67,0 by weight — Sucrose undetectable — Glucose (dextrose) 48,0 by weight in the dry state — Fructose: 48,8 by weight in the dry state — Ash: less than 0,01 % by weight — Titratable acids (pH 7,0) as tartaric acid 0,11 % by weight The trade description of this product is ‘rectified grape must concentrate’. 3. Carrot juice which has been subjected to lactic fermentation, ready for consumption as a beverage 2202 90 10 Classification is determined by the provisions of general rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the combined nomenclature and by the wording of CN codes 2202, 2202 90 and 2202 90 10. The product has a lower Ph value following lactic fermentation resulting in the product losing its original character as a vegetable juice of heading 2009 (see also the Explanatory Notes to the HS, heading 2009, paragraphs 3 and 7).
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.