Regulation (EEC) No 2840/72 of the Council of 19 December 1972 concluding an Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation and adopting provisions for its implementation and concluding an additional Agreement concerning the validity, for the Principality of Liechtenstein, of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Swiss Confederation of 22 July 1972
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 5
1. Customs duties on imports into Switzerland of products originating in the Community as originally constituted and in Ireland and listed in Annex C to this Protocol shall be progressively abolished in accordance with the following timetable: Timetable Percentage of basic duties applicable 1 April 1973 95 1 January 1974 90 1 January 1975 85 1 January 1976 80 1 July 1977 65 1 January 1979 50 1 January 1980 50 1 January 1981 35 1 January 1982 35 1 January 1983 20 1 January 1984 0 2. Customs duties on imports into Switzerland of products of Brussels Nomenclature heading No 44.18 originating in the Community as originally constituted and in Ireland shall be progressively abolished in accordance with the following timetable: Timetable Percentage of basic duties applicable 1 April 1973 95 1 January 1974 90 1 January 1975 85 1 January 1976 80 1 July 1977 65 1 January 1979 50 1 January 1980 40 1 January 1981 20 1 January 1982 0 3. Notwithstanding Article 3 of the Agreement, Switzerland reserves the right, in the light of its economic needs and administrative considerations, to apply the following customs duties to imports of products mentioned in Annex C and originating in Denmark, Norway and the United Kingdom: Timetable Percentage of basic duties applicable 1 April 1973 0 1 January 1974 25 1 January 1975 37·5 1 January 1976 50 1 July 1977 65 1 January 1979 50 1 January 1980 50 1 January 1981 35 1 January 1982 35 1 January 1983 20 1 January 1984 0
Article 5
1. Customs duties on imports into Switzerland of products originating in the Community as originally constituted and in Ireland and listed in Annex C to this Protocol shall be progressively abolished in accordance with the following timetable: Timetable Percentage of basic duties applicable 1 April 1973 95 1 January 1974 90 1 January 1975 85 1 January 1976 80 1 July 1977 65 1 January 1979 50 1 January 1980 50 1 January 1981 35 1 January 1982 35 1 January 1983 20 1 January 1984 0 2. Customs duties on imports into Switzerland of products of Brussels Nomenclature heading No 44.18 originating in the Community as originally constituted and in Ireland shall be progressively abolished in accordance with the following timetable: Timetable Percentage of basic duties applicable 1 April 1973 95 1 January 1974 90 1 January 1975 85 1 January 1976 80 1 July 1977 65 1 January 1979 50 1 January 1980 40 1 January 1981 20 1 January 1982 0 3. Notwithstanding Article 3 of the Agreement, Switzerland reserves the right, in the light of its economic needs and administrative considerations, to apply the following customs duties to imports of products mentioned in Annex C and originating in Denmark, Norway and the United Kingdom: Timetable Percentage of basic duties applicable 1 April 1973 0 1 January 1974 25 1 January 1975 37·5 1 January 1976 50 1 July 1977 65 1 January 1979 50 1 January 1980 50 1 January 1981 35 1 January 1982 35 1 January 1983 20 1 January 1984 0
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.