Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
147 Determinations of the Pensions Ombudsman.
(1) Where the Pensions Ombudsman has conducted an investigation under this Part he shall send by ordinary post a written statement of his determination of the complaint or dispute in question—
(a) to the person by whom, or on whose behalf, the complaint or reference was made; and
(b) to any person (if different) responsible for the management of the scheme to which the complaint or reference relates;. . .
(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
and any such statement shall contain the reasons for his determination.
(2) Where the Pensions Ombudsman makes a determination under this Part or under any corresponding legislation having effect in Great Britain, he may direct any person responsible for the management of the scheme to which the complaint or reference relates to take, or refrain from taking, such steps as he may specify in the statement referred to in subsection (1) or otherwise in writing.
(3) Subject to subsection (4), the determination by the Pensions Ombudsman of a complaint or dispute, and any direction given by him under subsection (2), shall be final and binding on—
(a) the person by whom, or on whose behalf, the complaint or reference was made;
(b) any person (if different) responsible for the management of the scheme to which the complaint or reference relates;
(ba) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(bb) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) any person claiming under a person falling within ....
(4) An appeal on a point of law shall lie to the Court of Appeal from a determination or direction of the Pensions Ombudsman at the instance of any person falling within paragraphs (a) to (c) of subsection (3).
(5) Any determination or direction of the Pensions Ombudsman shall be enforceable as if it were a judgment or order of the county court.
(6) If the Pensions Ombudsman considers it appropriate to do so in any particular case, he may publish in such form and manner as he thinks fit a report of any investigation under this Part and of the result of that investigation.
(7) For the purposes of the law of defamation, the publication of any matter by the Pensions Ombudsman—
(a) in submitting or publishing a report under section 145(6) of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 or subsection (6) of this section
(aa) in disclosing any information under section 145(5),, or
(b) in sending to any person a statement under subsection (1) or a direction under subsection (2),
shall be absolutely privileged.
Your change, as a redline
147 Determinations of the Pensions Ombudsman.
(1) Where the Pensions Ombudsman has conducted an investigation under this Part he shall send by ordinary post a written statement of his determination of the complaint or dispute in question—
(a) to the person by whom, or on whose behalf, the complaint or reference was made; and
(b) to any person (if different) responsible for the management of the scheme to which the complaint or reference relates;. . .
(c) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
and any such statement shall contain the reasons for his determination.
(2) Where the Pensions Ombudsman makes a determination under this Part or under any corresponding legislation having effect in Great Britain, he may direct any person responsible for the management of the scheme to which the complaint or reference relates to take, or refrain from taking, such steps as he may specify in the statement referred to in subsection (1) or otherwise in writing.
(3) Subject to subsection (4), the determination by the Pensions Ombudsman of a complaint or dispute, and any direction given by him under subsection (2), shall be final and binding on—
(a) the person by whom, or on whose behalf, the complaint or reference was made;
(b) any person (if different) responsible for the management of the scheme to which the complaint or reference relates;
(ba) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(bb) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) any person claiming under a person falling within ....
(4) An appeal on a point of law shall lie to the Court of Appeal from a determination or direction of the Pensions Ombudsman at the instance of any person falling within paragraphs (a) to (c) of subsection (3).
(5) Any determination or direction of the Pensions Ombudsman shall be enforceable as if it were a judgment or order of the county court.
(6) If the Pensions Ombudsman considers it appropriate to do so in any particular case, he may publish in such form and manner as he thinks fit a report of any investigation under this Part and of the result of that investigation.
(7) For the purposes of the law of defamation, the publication of any matter by the Pensions Ombudsman—
(a) in submitting or publishing a report under section 145(6) of the Pension Schemes Act 1993 or subsection (6) of this section
(aa) in disclosing any information under section 145(5),, or
(b) in sending to any person a statement under subsection (1) or a direction under subsection (2),
shall be absolutely privileged.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.