The Infrastructure Planning (Development Consent) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Amendment of the Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations 2011
(1) The Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations 2011 are amended as follows. (2) In regulation 2 (interpretation), in paragraph (1)— (a) in the definition of “EIA development”, for “2(1) of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 ” substitute “3(1) of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 ”; (b) in the definition of “interested party”, in sub-paragraph (c), for “43” substitute “56A”; (c) in the definition of “relevant local authority”— (i) for “43” substitute “56A”; (ii) for “section 42(1)(b)” substitute “sections 56(2)(b) and 60(2)(a)”. (3) In regulation 10 (duty to consult), in paragraph (1)(c)(iii), for “44” substitute “57”. (4) In regulation 17 (EIA development)— (a) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the words before sub-paragraph (a), for “Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 ” substitute “Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 ”; (ii) in sub-paragraph (a), for “3” substitute “4”; (iii) in sub-paragraph (b), for “6” substitute “8”; (iv) in sub-paragraph (c), for “8” substitute “10”; (v) in sub-paragraph (d), for “18” substitute “22”; (vi) in sub-paragraph (e), for “19” substitute “24”; (b) in paragraph (2)(c), for “the “consultation under section 42”” substitute ““publicising the proposed application under section 48””.
3 Amendment of the Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations 2011
(1) The Infrastructure Planning (Changes to, and Revocation of, Development Consent Orders) Regulations 2011 are amended as follows. (2) In regulation 2 (interpretation), in paragraph (1)— (a) in the definition of “EIA development”, for “2(1) of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 ” substitute “3(1) of the Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 ”; (b) in the definition of “interested party”, in sub-paragraph (c), for “43” substitute “56A”; (c) in the definition of “relevant local authority”— (i) for “43” substitute “56A”; (ii) for “section 42(1)(b)” substitute “sections 56(2)(b) and 60(2)(a)”. (3) In regulation 10 (duty to consult), in paragraph (1)(c)(iii), for “44” substitute “57”. (4) In regulation 17 (EIA development)— (a) in paragraph (1)— (i) in the words before sub-paragraph (a), for “Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2009 ” substitute “Infrastructure Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 ”; (ii) in sub-paragraph (a), for “3” substitute “4”; (iii) in sub-paragraph (b), for “6” substitute “8”; (iv) in sub-paragraph (c), for “8” substitute “10”; (v) in sub-paragraph (d), for “18” substitute “22”; (vi) in sub-paragraph (e), for “19” substitute “24”; (b) in paragraph (2)(c), for “the “consultation under section 42”” substitute ““publicising the proposed application under section 48””.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.