The Register of People with Significant Control (Amendment) Regulations 2025
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
4 Amendments to Part 21A of the 2006 Act
In section 790EB of the 2006 Act (company’s duty to notify failure to comply with notices)— (a) after subsection (1) insert— (1A) The notice must state the day on which the period mentioned in subsection (1) ends. (1B) Where a company notifies the registrar that a person has failed to comply with a notice given by the company under section 790E or 790EA, the notice must state the person’s name. ; (b) after subsection (2) insert— (3) In this section “name”, in relation to an individual, means their forename and surname. .
4 Amendments to Part 21A of the 2006 Act
In section 790EB of the 2006 Act (company’s duty to notify failure to comply with notices)— (a) after subsection (1) insert— (1A) The notice must state the day on which the period mentioned in subsection (1) ends. (1B) Where a company notifies the registrar that a person has failed to comply with a notice given by the company under section 790E or 790EA, the notice must state the person’s name. ; (b) after subsection (2) insert— (3) In this section “name”, in relation to an individual, means their forename and surname. .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.