The Health Care Services (Provider Selection Regime) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
20A Exclusions: sub-contractors
(1) A relevant authority must as part of a procurement process under these Regulations— (a) request information about whether a provider intends to sub-contract the performance of all or part of the contract, and (b) seek to determine whether any intended sub-contractor is on the debarment list. (2) A relevant authority may, as part of a procurement process under these Regulations, request information for the purpose of determining whether any intended sub-contractor is an excluded or excludable provider. (3) Subject to paragraph (4), if after requesting information under paragraph (1) or (2) a relevant authority considers that a provider intends to sub-contract to a provider that is an excluded provider, the relevant authority must exclude the provider from the procurement process. (4) A relevant authority may award a contract to a provider that would otherwise be excluded from the procurement process under paragraph (3) if the relevant authority considers that there are overriding reasons relating to the public interest, including public health. (5) If, after requesting information under paragraph (1) or (2), a relevant authority considers that a provider intends to sub-contract to a provider that is an excludable provider, the relevant authority may exclude the provider from the procurement process. (6) Before excluding a provider under paragraph (3) or (5), a relevant authority must— (a) notify the provider of its intention, and (b) give the provider reasonable opportunity to find an alternative provider with which to sub-contract.
20A Exclusions: sub-contractors
(1) A relevant authority must as part of a procurement process under these Regulations— (a) request information about whether a provider intends to sub-contract the performance of all or part of the contract, and (b) seek to determine whether any intended sub-contractor is on the debarment list. (2) A relevant authority may, as part of a procurement process under these Regulations, request information for the purpose of determining whether any intended sub-contractor is an excluded or excludable provider. (3) Subject to paragraph (4), if after requesting information under paragraph (1) or (2) a relevant authority considers that a provider intends to sub-contract to a provider that is an excluded provider, the relevant authority must exclude the provider from the procurement process. (4) A relevant authority may award a contract to a provider that would otherwise be excluded from the procurement process under paragraph (3) if the relevant authority considers that there are overriding reasons relating to the public interest, including public health. (5) If, after requesting information under paragraph (1) or (2), a relevant authority considers that a provider intends to sub-contract to a provider that is an excludable provider, the relevant authority may exclude the provider from the procurement process. (6) Before excluding a provider under paragraph (3) or (5), a relevant authority must— (a) notify the provider of its intention, and (b) give the provider reasonable opportunity to find an alternative provider with which to sub-contract.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.