The Armed Forces (Service Complaints) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
2 Amendment of the 2015 Regulations
(1) The 2015 Regulations are amended as follows. (2) In regulation 2(1) (interpretation), for “officer”, in both places it occurs, substitute “person”. (3) In regulation 3 (specified officer)— (a) in the heading, for “specified officer” substitute “specified person”; (b) in paragraph (1), for “specified officer is an officer” substitute “specified person is a person”; (c) in paragraph 2— (i) for “the officer” substitute “the person”; (ii) for “specified officer”, in both places it occurs, substitute “specified person”; (iii) for “an officer” substitute “a person”. (4) In regulation 4(1) (procedure for making a service complaint), for “officer” substitute “person”. (5) In regulation 5 (action on receipt of a service complaint and admissibility), for “officer”, in each place it occurs, substitute “person”. (6) In regulation 6 (period for making a service complaint and power to stay)— (a) in paragraphs (3) and (7), for “person”, in each place it occurs, substitute “complainant”; (b) in paragraphs (3), (6) and (7) for “specified officer”, in each place it occurs, substitute “specified person”. (7) In regulation 7 (Commissioner’s review of admissibility)— (a) for “officer’s”, in both places it occurs, substitute “person’s”; (b) for “officer”, in both places it occurs, substitute “person”. (8) In regulation 8 (application of these regulations where further matters raised by way of complaint), for “officer” substitute “person”. (9) In regulation 9(1) (decisions on a service complaint), for “officer” substitute “person”.
2 Amendment of the 2015 Regulations
(1) The 2015 Regulations are amended as follows. (2) In regulation 2(1) (interpretation), for “officer”, in both places it occurs, substitute “person”. (3) In regulation 3 (specified officer)— (a) in the heading, for “specified officer” substitute “specified person”; (b) in paragraph (1), for “specified officer is an officer” substitute “specified person is a person”; (c) in paragraph 2— (i) for “the officer” substitute “the person”; (ii) for “specified officer”, in both places it occurs, substitute “specified person”; (iii) for “an officer” substitute “a person”. (4) In regulation 4(1) (procedure for making a service complaint), for “officer” substitute “person”. (5) In regulation 5 (action on receipt of a service complaint and admissibility), for “officer”, in each place it occurs, substitute “person”. (6) In regulation 6 (period for making a service complaint and power to stay)— (a) in paragraphs (3) and (7), for “person”, in each place it occurs, substitute “complainant”; (b) in paragraphs (3), (6) and (7) for “specified officer”, in each place it occurs, substitute “specified person”. (7) In regulation 7 (Commissioner’s review of admissibility)— (a) for “officer’s”, in both places it occurs, substitute “person’s”; (b) for “officer”, in both places it occurs, substitute “person”. (8) In regulation 8 (application of these regulations where further matters raised by way of complaint), for “officer” substitute “person”. (9) In regulation 9(1) (decisions on a service complaint), for “officer” substitute “person”.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.