The Armed Forces (Service Complaints) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
3 Transitional Provisions
(1) For the purposes of regulation 5 of the 2015 Regulations, where a statement of complaint was received by the specified officer before 3rd November 2026, it is to be treated as having been received by the specified person. (2) For the purposes of regulation 7 of the 2015 Regulations, any decision made by the specified officer before 3rd November 2026 that a service complaint is not admissible is to be treated as a decision made by the specified person. (3) In this regulation, “specified officer” has the meaning given in regulation 2 of the 2015 Regulations as they had effect immediately before the date on which these regulations come into force.
3 Transitional Provisions
(1) For the purposes of regulation 5 of the 2015 Regulations, where a statement of complaint was received by the specified officer before 3rd November 2026, it is to be treated as having been received by the specified person. (2) For the purposes of regulation 7 of the 2015 Regulations, any decision made by the specified officer before 3rd November 2026 that a service complaint is not admissible is to be treated as a decision made by the specified person. (3) In this regulation, “specified officer” has the meaning given in regulation 2 of the 2015 Regulations as they had effect immediately before the date on which these regulations come into force.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.