Rating and Valuation (Amendment) (Scotland) Act 1984
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
13 Constitution of lands valuation appeal court.
(1) in section 7 of the Valuation of Lands (Scotland) Amendment Act 1879 (which sections, construed as originally enacted, provide, amongst other things, that appeals in valuation matters shall lie to two judges of the Court of Session), for the words “any two” there shall be substituted the words “a judge or (in a case in relation to which the judge to whom it was submitted has directed that it be heard by three judges or where the appeal is against a determination of the Lands Tribunal for Scotland under section 1(3A) of the Lands Tribunal Act 1949) three”. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In the said section 7— (a) for the word “judges”, where secondly and thirdly occurring, there shall be substituted the words “judge or, as the case may be, judges”; and (b) for the word “their”, in each place where it occurs, there shall be substituted the words “his or, as the case may be, their”. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
13 Constitution of lands valuation appeal court.
(1) in section 7 of the Valuation of Lands (Scotland) Amendment Act 1879 (which sections, construed as originally enacted, provide, amongst other things, that appeals in valuation matters shall lie to two judges of the Court of Session), for the words “any two” there shall be substituted the words “a judge or (in a case in relation to which the judge to whom it was submitted has directed that it be heard by three judges or where the appeal is against a determination of the Lands Tribunal for Scotland under section 1(3A) of the Lands Tribunal Act 1949) three”. (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (3) In the said section 7— (a) for the word “judges”, where secondly and thirdly occurring, there shall be substituted the words “judge or, as the case may be, judges”; and (b) for the word “their”, in each place where it occurs, there shall be substituted the words “his or, as the case may be, their”. (4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.