Propose a change

Deregulation Act 2015

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

42 Optional building requirements

After section 2A of the Building Act 1984 insert— Optional requirements 2B (1) Building regulations made by the Secretary of State in relation to England may include a requirement that applies only where a planning authority makes compliance with the requirement a condition of a grant of planning permission. (2) In the following provisions of this section, a requirement included in building regulations by virtue of subsection (1) is referred to as an “optional requirement”. (3) Building regulations may specify that an optional requirement is capable of applying only in respect of development of a kind described in the regulations. (4) Building regulations may specify conditions that must be satisfied before a planning authority may make compliance with an optional requirement a condition of the grant of planning permission. (5) Building regulations may specify the steps that a planning authority must take to inform a person subject to an optional requirement of the requirement. (6) Where building regulations include an optional requirement that would (to any extent) be inconsistent with another requirement imposed by the regulations, the building regulations must provide— (a) that the other requirement does not apply in any case where the optional requirement applies, or (b) that the other requirement applies in any such case with modifications specified in the regulations. (7) In this section — “development” has the same meaning as in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (see section 55 of that Act); “planning authority” means— a local planning authority within the meaning of that Act (see section 336(1)); the Secretary of State (in the exercise of functions of granting planning permission); “planning permission” has the same meaning as in that Act (see section 336(1)).

Your change, as a redline

42 Optional building requirements

After section 2A of the Building Act 1984 insert— Optional requirements 2B (1) Building regulations made by the Secretary of State in relation to England may include a requirement that applies only where a planning authority makes compliance with the requirement a condition of a grant of planning permission. (2) In the following provisions of this section, a requirement included in building regulations by virtue of subsection (1) is referred to as an “optional requirement”. (3) Building regulations may specify that an optional requirement is capable of applying only in respect of development of a kind described in the regulations. (4) Building regulations may specify conditions that must be satisfied before a planning authority may make compliance with an optional requirement a condition of the grant of planning permission. (5) Building regulations may specify the steps that a planning authority must take to inform a person subject to an optional requirement of the requirement. (6) Where building regulations include an optional requirement that would (to any extent) be inconsistent with another requirement imposed by the regulations, the building regulations must provide— (a) that the other requirement does not apply in any case where the optional requirement applies, or (b) that the other requirement applies in any such case with modifications specified in the regulations. (7) In this section — “development” has the same meaning as in the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (see section 55 of that Act); “planning authority” means— a local planning authority within the meaning of that Act (see section 336(1)); the Secretary of State (in the exercise of functions of granting planning permission); “planning permission” has the same meaning as in that Act (see section 336(1)).

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds