Propose a change

Social Security Contributions and Benefits Act 1992

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

171ZA Entitlement: birth

(1) Where a person satisfies the conditions in subsection (2) below, he shall be entitled in accordance with the following provisions of this Part to payments to be known as “statutory paternity pay”. (2) The conditions are— (a) that he satisfies prescribed conditions— (i) as to relationship with a newborn child, and (ii) as to relationship with the child’s mother; (b) that he has been in employed earner’s employment with an employer for a continuous period of at least 26 weeks ending with the relevant week; (c) that his normal weekly earnings for the period of 8 weeks ending with the relevant week are not less than the lower earnings limit in force under section 5(1)(a) above at the end of the relevant week; and (d) that he has been in employed earner’s employment with the employer by reference to whom the condition in paragraph (b) above is satisfied for a continuous period beginning with the end of the relevant week and ending with the day on which the child is born. (3) The references in subsection (2) above to the relevant week are to the week immediately preceding the 14th week before the expected week of the child’s birth. (4) A person’s entitlement to ... statutory paternity pay under this section shall not be affected by the birth, or expected birth, of more than one child as a result of the same pregnancy. (5) In this section, “newborn child” includes a child stillborn after twenty-four weeks of pregnancy.

Your change, as a redline

171ZA Entitlement: birth

(1) Where a person satisfies the conditions in subsection (2) below, he shall be entitled in accordance with the following provisions of this Part to payments to be known as “statutory paternity pay”. (2) The conditions are— (a) that he satisfies prescribed conditions— (i) as to relationship with a newborn child, and (ii) as to relationship with the child’s mother; (b) that he has been in employed earner’s employment with an employer for a continuous period of at least 26 weeks ending with the relevant week; (c) that his normal weekly earnings for the period of 8 weeks ending with the relevant week are not less than the lower earnings limit in force under section 5(1)(a) above at the end of the relevant week; and (d) that he has been in employed earner’s employment with the employer by reference to whom the condition in paragraph (b) above is satisfied for a continuous period beginning with the end of the relevant week and ending with the day on which the child is born. (3) The references in subsection (2) above to the relevant week are to the week immediately preceding the 14th week before the expected week of the child’s birth. (4) A person’s entitlement to ... statutory paternity pay under this section shall not be affected by the birth, or expected birth, of more than one child as a result of the same pregnancy. (5) In this section, “newborn child” includes a child stillborn after twenty-four weeks of pregnancy.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds