Propose a change

Public Service Pensions Act 2013

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

13 Employer contributions in funded schemes

(1) This section applies in relation to a scheme under section 1 which is a defined benefits scheme with a pension fund. (2) Scheme regulations must provide for the rate of employer contributions to be set at an appropriate level to ensure— (a) the solvency of the pension fund, and (b) the long-term cost-efficiency of the scheme, so far as relating to the pension fund. (3) For that purpose, scheme regulations must require actuarial valuations of the pension fund. (4) Where an actuarial valuation under subsection (3) has taken place, a person appointed by the responsible authority is to report on whether the following aims are achieved— (a) the valuation is in accordance with the scheme regulations; (b) the valuation has been carried out in a way which is not inconsistent with other valuations under subsection (3); (c) the rate of employer contributions is set as specified in subsection (2). (5) A report under subsection (4) must be published; and a copy must be sent to the scheme manager and (if different) the responsible authority. (6) If a report under subsection (4) states that, in the view of the person making the report, any of the aims in that subsection has not been achieved— (a) the report may recommend remedial steps; (b) the scheme manager must— (i) take such remedial steps as the scheme manager considers appropriate, and (ii) publish details of those steps and the reasons for taking them; (c) the responsible authority may— (i) require the scheme manager to report on progress in taking remedial steps; (ii) direct the scheme manager to take such remedial steps as the responsible authority considers appropriate. (7) The person appointed under subsection (4) must, in the view of the responsible authority, be appropriately qualified.

Your change, as a redline

13 Employer contributions in funded schemes

(1) This section applies in relation to a scheme under section 1 which is a defined benefits scheme with a pension fund. (2) Scheme regulations must provide for the rate of employer contributions to be set at an appropriate level to ensure— (a) the solvency of the pension fund, and (b) the long-term cost-efficiency of the scheme, so far as relating to the pension fund. (3) For that purpose, scheme regulations must require actuarial valuations of the pension fund. (4) Where an actuarial valuation under subsection (3) has taken place, a person appointed by the responsible authority is to report on whether the following aims are achieved— (a) the valuation is in accordance with the scheme regulations; (b) the valuation has been carried out in a way which is not inconsistent with other valuations under subsection (3); (c) the rate of employer contributions is set as specified in subsection (2). (5) A report under subsection (4) must be published; and a copy must be sent to the scheme manager and (if different) the responsible authority. (6) If a report under subsection (4) states that, in the view of the person making the report, any of the aims in that subsection has not been achieved— (a) the report may recommend remedial steps; (b) the scheme manager must— (i) take such remedial steps as the scheme manager considers appropriate, and (ii) publish details of those steps and the reasons for taking them; (c) the responsible authority may— (i) require the scheme manager to report on progress in taking remedial steps; (ii) direct the scheme manager to take such remedial steps as the responsible authority considers appropriate. (7) The person appointed under subsection (4) must, in the view of the responsible authority, be appropriately qualified.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds