The National Security Act 2023 (Prevention and Investigation Measures) (Polygraph) Regulations 2023
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE Reviews by a Polygraph Supervisor
Regulation 6 1 For each review a polygraph supervisor must— (a) examine charts produced during the polygraph session, and (b) examine the report of the polygraph session. 2 For each review a polygraph supervisor must consider— (a) the question formulation by the polygraph operator. In particular, the polygraph supervisor should assess— (i) whether the polygraph operator consulted the Secretary of State when the questions were formulated, (ii) whether the questions were relevant questions, and (iii) whether the questions asked were sufficiently clear to allow for a polygraph indication of deception, (b) the technique of the polygraph operator. In particular, the polygraph supervisor should assess whether the following met the applicable standards of the American Polygraph Association— (i) the analysis by the polygraph operator of the physiological responses of the relevant individual, and (ii) the assessments by the polygraph operator of truth or deception, (c) whether the polygraph session was conducted in accordance with these Regulations and with the contract between the polygraph provider and the Secretary of State, and (d) whether the polygraph session met the standards of the American Polygraphy Association on good polygraphy practice. 3 If a polygraph supervisor identifies a failure when considering the matters in paragraph (2) of this Schedule, the polygraph supervisor must— (a) record that failure as part of the review, (b) inform the polygraph provider and the polygraph operator who conducted the polygraph session as soon as is reasonably practicable, (c) propose appropriate remedial action to that polygraph operator, and (d) arrange for additional sessions conducted by that polygraph operator to be reviewed, if the review indicates a concern about practice.
SCHEDULE Reviews by a Polygraph Supervisor
Regulation 6 1 For each review a polygraph supervisor must— (a) examine charts produced during the polygraph session, and (b) examine the report of the polygraph session. 2 For each review a polygraph supervisor must consider— (a) the question formulation by the polygraph operator. In particular, the polygraph supervisor should assess— (i) whether the polygraph operator consulted the Secretary of State when the questions were formulated, (ii) whether the questions were relevant questions, and (iii) whether the questions asked were sufficiently clear to allow for a polygraph indication of deception, (b) the technique of the polygraph operator. In particular, the polygraph supervisor should assess whether the following met the applicable standards of the American Polygraph Association— (i) the analysis by the polygraph operator of the physiological responses of the relevant individual, and (ii) the assessments by the polygraph operator of truth or deception, (c) whether the polygraph session was conducted in accordance with these Regulations and with the contract between the polygraph provider and the Secretary of State, and (d) whether the polygraph session met the standards of the American Polygraphy Association on good polygraphy practice. 3 If a polygraph supervisor identifies a failure when considering the matters in paragraph (2) of this Schedule, the polygraph supervisor must— (a) record that failure as part of the review, (b) inform the polygraph provider and the polygraph operator who conducted the polygraph session as soon as is reasonably practicable, (c) propose appropriate remedial action to that polygraph operator, and (d) arrange for additional sessions conducted by that polygraph operator to be reviewed, if the review indicates a concern about practice.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
How this law is officially changed
Solon does not know this law's official route yet. The proposal is recorded all the same, and the route appears here once its source is added.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.