Supply and Appropriation (Anticipation and Adjustments) Act 2018
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
SCHEDULE 2 Appropriation of excesses for financial year 2016-17
Section 5 Competition and Markets Authority Competition and Markets Authority, 2016-17 Estimate | Net resources authorised for current purposes | Net resources authorised for capital purposes | Net Cash Requirement (£) | (£) | (£) Competition and Markets Authority Departmental Expenditure Limit | 0 | 0 Annually Managed Expenditure | 65,506,000 | 0 Non-Budget Expenditure | 0 Net Cash Requirement | 0 Total | 65,506,000 | 0 | 0 Annually Managed Expenditure Expenditure arising from: Provisions and other non-cash costs. House of Commons: Members House of Commons: Members, 2016-17 Estimate | Net resources authorised for current purposes | Net resources authorised for capital purposes | Net Cash Requirement (£) | (£) | (£) House of Commons: Members Departmental Expenditure Limit | 0 | 55,000 Annually Managed Expenditure | 0 | 0 Non-Budget Expenditure | 0 Net Cash Requirement | 0 Total | 0 | 55,000 | 0 Departmental Expenditure Limit Expenditure arising from: This Estimate covers expenditure arising from the Exchequer contribution to the Parliamentary Contribution Fund (PCPF); payroll costs of Members appointed to specific parliamentary duties, provision of ICT equipment to Members, Members' stationery and postage expenditure, financial assistance to Opposition parties to support them in the discharge of their Parliamentary or representative functions, an Exchequer contribution to the Members' Fund, provision of training for Members and their staff, payment for insurance, grants and grants-inaid to organisations who promote the House of Commons' objectives, other general costs and non-cash items.
SCHEDULE 2 Appropriation of excesses for financial year 2016-17
Section 5 Competition and Markets Authority Competition and Markets Authority, 2016-17 Estimate | Net resources authorised for current purposes | Net resources authorised for capital purposes | Net Cash Requirement (£) | (£) | (£) Competition and Markets Authority Departmental Expenditure Limit | 0 | 0 Annually Managed Expenditure | 65,506,000 | 0 Non-Budget Expenditure | 0 Net Cash Requirement | 0 Total | 65,506,000 | 0 | 0 Annually Managed Expenditure Expenditure arising from: Provisions and other non-cash costs. House of Commons: Members House of Commons: Members, 2016-17 Estimate | Net resources authorised for current purposes | Net resources authorised for capital purposes | Net Cash Requirement (£) | (£) | (£) House of Commons: Members Departmental Expenditure Limit | 0 | 55,000 Annually Managed Expenditure | 0 | 0 Non-Budget Expenditure | 0 Net Cash Requirement | 0 Total | 0 | 55,000 | 0 Departmental Expenditure Limit Expenditure arising from: This Estimate covers expenditure arising from the Exchequer contribution to the Parliamentary Contribution Fund (PCPF); payroll costs of Members appointed to specific parliamentary duties, provision of ICT equipment to Members, Members' stationery and postage expenditure, financial assistance to Opposition parties to support them in the discharge of their Parliamentary or representative functions, an Exchequer contribution to the Members' Fund, provision of training for Members and their staff, payment for insurance, grants and grants-inaid to organisations who promote the House of Commons' objectives, other general costs and non-cash items.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.