Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
As published
4 The High Court.
(1) The High Court shall consist of—
(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) the Lord Chief Justice;
(ba) the President of the Queen's Bench Division;
(c) the President of the Family Division;
(d) the President of the Business and Property Division;
(dd) the Senior Presiding Judge
(ddd) the vice-president of the Queen’s Bench Division; and
(e) the puisne judges of that court, of whom the maximum full-time equivalent number is 108.
(2) The puisne judges of the High Court shall be styled “Justices of the High Court”.
(3) All the judges of the High Court shall, except where this Act expressly provides otherwise, have in all respects equal power, authority and jurisdiction.
(4) Her Majesty may by Order in Council from time to time amend subsection (1) so as to increase or further increase the maximum full-time equivalent number of puisne judges of the High Court.
(4A) It is for the Lord Chancellor to recommend to Her Majesty the making of an Order under subsection (4).
(5) No recommendation shall be made to Her Majesty in Council to make an Order under subsection (4) unless a draft of the Order has been laid before Parliament and approved by resolution of each House of Parliament.
(6) The High Court shall be taken to be duly constituted notwithstanding any vacancy in the office of . . . Lord Chief Justice, President of the Queen's Bench Division, President of the Family Division, President of the Business and Property Division or Senior Presiding Judge and whether or not an appointment has been made to the office of vice-president of the Queen’s Bench Division..
(7) For the purposes of this section the full-time equivalent number of puisne judges is to be calculated by taking the number of full-time puisne judges and adding, for each puisne judge who is not a full-time puisne judge, such fraction as is reasonable.
Your change, as a redline
4 The High Court.
(1) The High Court shall consist of—
(a) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(b) the Lord Chief Justice;
(ba) the President of the Queen's Bench Division;
(c) the President of the Family Division;
(d) the President of the Business and Property Division;
(dd) the Senior Presiding Judge
(ddd) the vice-president of the Queen’s Bench Division; and
(e) the puisne judges of that court, of whom the maximum full-time equivalent number is 108.
(2) The puisne judges of the High Court shall be styled “Justices of the High Court”.
(3) All the judges of the High Court shall, except where this Act expressly provides otherwise, have in all respects equal power, authority and jurisdiction.
(4) Her Majesty may by Order in Council from time to time amend subsection (1) so as to increase or further increase the maximum full-time equivalent number of puisne judges of the High Court.
(4A) It is for the Lord Chancellor to recommend to Her Majesty the making of an Order under subsection (4).
(5) No recommendation shall be made to Her Majesty in Council to make an Order under subsection (4) unless a draft of the Order has been laid before Parliament and approved by resolution of each House of Parliament.
(6) The High Court shall be taken to be duly constituted notwithstanding any vacancy in the office of . . . Lord Chief Justice, President of the Queen's Bench Division, President of the Family Division, President of the Business and Property Division or Senior Presiding Judge and whether or not an appointment has been made to the office of vice-president of the Queen’s Bench Division..
(7) For the purposes of this section the full-time equivalent number of puisne judges is to be calculated by taking the number of full-time puisne judges and adding, for each puisne judge who is not a full-time puisne judge, such fraction as is reasonable.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.