Prosecution of Offences Act 1985
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
22B Re-institution of proceedings stayed under section 22(4) or 22A(5).
(1) This section applies where proceedings for an offence (“the original proceedings ”) are stayed by a court under section 22(4) or 22A(5) of this Act. (2) If— (a) in the case of proceedings conducted by the Director, the Director or a Chief Crown Prosecutor so directs; (b) in the case of proceedings conducted by the Director of the Serious Fraud Office, the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or the Commissioners of Customs and Excise, that Director or those Commissioners so direct; or (c) in the case of proceedings not conducted as mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) above, a person designated for the purpose by the Secretary of State so directs, fresh proceedings for the offence may be instituted within a period of three months (or such longer period as the court may allow) after the date on which the original proceedings were stayed by the court. (3) Fresh proceedings shall be instituted as follows— (a) where the original proceedings were stayed by the Crown Court, by preferring a bill of indictment; (b) where the original proceedings were stayed by a magistrates’ court, by laying an information. (4) Fresh proceedings may be instituted in accordance with subsections (2) and (3)(b) above notwithstanding anything in section 127(1) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (limitation of time). (5) Where fresh proceedings are instituted, anything done in relation to the original proceedings shall be treated as done in relation to the fresh proceedings if the court so directs or it was done— (a) by the prosecutor in compliance or purported compliance with section 3, 4 or 7A or 9 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996; or (b) by the accused in compliance or purported compliance with section 5 or 6 of that Act. (6) Where a person is convicted of an offence in fresh proceedings under this section, the institution of those proceedings shall not be called into question in any appeal against that conviction.
22B Re-institution of proceedings stayed under section 22(4) or 22A(5).
(1) This section applies where proceedings for an offence (“the original proceedings ”) are stayed by a court under section 22(4) or 22A(5) of this Act. (2) If— (a) in the case of proceedings conducted by the Director, the Director or a Chief Crown Prosecutor so directs; (b) in the case of proceedings conducted by the Director of the Serious Fraud Office, the Commissioners of Inland Revenue or the Commissioners of Customs and Excise, that Director or those Commissioners so direct; or (c) in the case of proceedings not conducted as mentioned in paragraph (a) or (b) above, a person designated for the purpose by the Secretary of State so directs, fresh proceedings for the offence may be instituted within a period of three months (or such longer period as the court may allow) after the date on which the original proceedings were stayed by the court. (3) Fresh proceedings shall be instituted as follows— (a) where the original proceedings were stayed by the Crown Court, by preferring a bill of indictment; (b) where the original proceedings were stayed by a magistrates’ court, by laying an information. (4) Fresh proceedings may be instituted in accordance with subsections (2) and (3)(b) above notwithstanding anything in section 127(1) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 (limitation of time). (5) Where fresh proceedings are instituted, anything done in relation to the original proceedings shall be treated as done in relation to the fresh proceedings if the court so directs or it was done— (a) by the prosecutor in compliance or purported compliance with section 3, 4 or 7A or 9 of the Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996; or (b) by the accused in compliance or purported compliance with section 5 or 6 of that Act. (6) Where a person is convicted of an offence in fresh proceedings under this section, the institution of those proceedings shall not be called into question in any appeal against that conviction.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.