Electoral Administration Act 2006
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
43 Access to other election documents: contravention of regulations
(1) A person is guilty of an offence— (a) if he fails to comply with any conditions imposed in pursuance of regulations under section 42, or (b) if he is an appropriate supervisor of a person (P) who fails to comply with such a condition and he failed to take appropriate steps. (2) P is not guilty of an offence under subsection (1) if— (a) he has an appropriate supervisor, and (b) he has complied with all the requirements imposed on him by his appropriate supervisor. (3) A person who is not P or an appropriate supervisor is not guilty of an offence under subsection (1) if he takes all reasonable steps to ensure that he complies with the conditions. (4) In subsections (1)(b) and (2)— (a) an appropriate supervisor is a person who is a director of a company or concerned in the management of an organisation in which P is employed or under whose direction or control P is; (b) appropriate steps are such steps as it was reasonable for the appropriate supervisor to take to secure the operation of procedures designed to prevent, so far as reasonably practicable, the occurrence of a failure to comply with the conditions. (5) A person guilty of an offence as mentioned in subsection (1) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.
43 Access to other election documents: contravention of regulations
(1) A person is guilty of an offence— (a) if he fails to comply with any conditions imposed in pursuance of regulations under section 42, or (b) if he is an appropriate supervisor of a person (P) who fails to comply with such a condition and he failed to take appropriate steps. (2) P is not guilty of an offence under subsection (1) if— (a) he has an appropriate supervisor, and (b) he has complied with all the requirements imposed on him by his appropriate supervisor. (3) A person who is not P or an appropriate supervisor is not guilty of an offence under subsection (1) if he takes all reasonable steps to ensure that he complies with the conditions. (4) In subsections (1)(b) and (2)— (a) an appropriate supervisor is a person who is a director of a company or concerned in the management of an organisation in which P is employed or under whose direction or control P is; (b) appropriate steps are such steps as it was reasonable for the appropriate supervisor to take to secure the operation of procedures designed to prevent, so far as reasonably practicable, the occurrence of a failure to comply with the conditions. (5) A person guilty of an offence as mentioned in subsection (1) is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.