Propose a change

Chiropractors Act 1994

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

32 Offences.

(1) A person who (whether expressly or by implication) describes himself as a chiropractor, chiropractic practitioner, chiropractitioner, chiropractic physician, or any other kind of chiropractor, is guilty of an offence unless he is a registered chiropractor. (2) A person who, without reasonable excuse, fails to comply with any requirement imposed by— (a) the Professional Conduct Committee, (b) the Health Committee, or (c) an appeal tribunal hearing an appeal under section 30, under rules made by virtue of section 26(2)(h) or under any corresponding rules made by virtue of section 30(4) is guilty of an offence. (3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level five on the standard scale.

Your change, as a redline

32 Offences.

(1) A person who (whether expressly or by implication) describes himself as a chiropractor, chiropractic practitioner, chiropractitioner, chiropractic physician, or any other kind of chiropractor, is guilty of an offence unless he is a registered chiropractor. (2) A person who, without reasonable excuse, fails to comply with any requirement imposed by— (a) the Professional Conduct Committee, (b) the Health Committee, or (c) an appeal tribunal hearing an appeal under section 30, under rules made by virtue of section 26(2)(h) or under any corresponding rules made by virtue of section 30(4) is guilty of an offence. (3) A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level five on the standard scale.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds