The Ministry of Defence Police (Barred List and Advisory List) Regulations 2026
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
16 Amendment of Schedule 2 to the 2020 Regulations
(1) Schedule 2 to the 2020 Regulations (modifications to the Conduct Regulations in their application to former officers) is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph 3 (modification: insertion of Part 1A)— (a) in the inserted regulation 5A— (i) in paragraph (7)(a) for “as a constable” substitute “by a law enforcement employer”; (ii) after paragraph (8) insert— (9) In paragraph (7)(a) “law enforcement employer” has the meaning given in section 206(1) of the Crime and Policing Act 2026. ; (b) in the inserted regulation 5B, for paragraph (2)(c) substitute— (c) explain that— (i) if disciplinary proceedings are taken and the allegation of gross misconduct is proved, the officer concerned may be subject to a finding that the officer would have been dismissed if the officer had not ceased to be a member of the MDP, and (ii) if the officer concerned is subject to such a finding, the officer will be included in the MDP barred list; . (3) In paragraph 12 (modification to regulation 16), after paragraph (a) insert— (ab) for sub-paragraph (da) there were substituted— (da) that if the officer is subject to such a finding, information including the officer’s full name and a description of the conduct which would have led to the officer's dismissal will be added to the MDP barred list and may be subject to publication for a period of up to 5 years, ; . (4) In paragraph 36 (modification to regulation 41), after paragraph (2) of the substituted regulation 41 insert— (3) Paragraph (4) applies where disciplinary action for gross misconduct is imposed. (4) The person chairing a misconduct hearing must provide to the Secretary of State any information they consider would assist the Secretary of State in determining whether regulation 8(4) of the Barred List and Advisory List Regulations 2026 applies (requirement not to publish information relating to the officer concerned). . (5) For paragraph 41 (modification to regulation 49), substitute— 41 Regulation 49 is to be read as if in paragraph (2)(b), for the words from “for the officer concerned” to the end of the paragraph, there were substituted “that the officer concerned should be included in the MDP barred list”. . (6) In paragraph 51 (modification to regulation 62), after paragraph (2) of the substituted regulation 62 insert— (3) Paragraph (4) applies where disciplinary action for gross misconduct is imposed. (4) The person chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing must provide to the Secretary of State any information they consider would assist the Secretary of State in determining whether regulation 8(4) of the Barred List and Advisory List Regulations 2026 applies (requirement not to publish information relating to the officer concerned). .
16 Amendment of Schedule 2 to the 2020 Regulations
(1) Schedule 2 to the 2020 Regulations (modifications to the Conduct Regulations in their application to former officers) is amended as follows. (2) In paragraph 3 (modification: insertion of Part 1A)— (a) in the inserted regulation 5A— (i) in paragraph (7)(a) for “as a constable” substitute “by a law enforcement employer”; (ii) after paragraph (8) insert— (9) In paragraph (7)(a) “law enforcement employer” has the meaning given in section 206(1) of the Crime and Policing Act 2026. ; (b) in the inserted regulation 5B, for paragraph (2)(c) substitute— (c) explain that— (i) if disciplinary proceedings are taken and the allegation of gross misconduct is proved, the officer concerned may be subject to a finding that the officer would have been dismissed if the officer had not ceased to be a member of the MDP, and (ii) if the officer concerned is subject to such a finding, the officer will be included in the MDP barred list; . (3) In paragraph 12 (modification to regulation 16), after paragraph (a) insert— (ab) for sub-paragraph (da) there were substituted— (da) that if the officer is subject to such a finding, information including the officer’s full name and a description of the conduct which would have led to the officer's dismissal will be added to the MDP barred list and may be subject to publication for a period of up to 5 years, ; . (4) In paragraph 36 (modification to regulation 41), after paragraph (2) of the substituted regulation 41 insert— (3) Paragraph (4) applies where disciplinary action for gross misconduct is imposed. (4) The person chairing a misconduct hearing must provide to the Secretary of State any information they consider would assist the Secretary of State in determining whether regulation 8(4) of the Barred List and Advisory List Regulations 2026 applies (requirement not to publish information relating to the officer concerned). . (5) For paragraph 41 (modification to regulation 49), substitute— 41 Regulation 49 is to be read as if in paragraph (2)(b), for the words from “for the officer concerned” to the end of the paragraph, there were substituted “that the officer concerned should be included in the MDP barred list”. . (6) In paragraph 51 (modification to regulation 62), after paragraph (2) of the substituted regulation 62 insert— (3) Paragraph (4) applies where disciplinary action for gross misconduct is imposed. (4) The person chairing the accelerated misconduct hearing must provide to the Secretary of State any information they consider would assist the Secretary of State in determining whether regulation 8(4) of the Barred List and Advisory List Regulations 2026 applies (requirement not to publish information relating to the officer concerned). .
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.