Council Regulation (EEC) No 56/83 of 16 December 1982 concerning the implementation of the Agreement on the international carriage of passengers by road by means of occasional coach and bus services (ASOR)
Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.
Change 1
Article 10
1. If a Member State considers withdrawal from the ASOR to be necessary, it shall forward a reasoned request to the Commission and shall inform the other Member States thereof. The Commission shall examine the request and consult the Member States. 2. The Commission shall submit to the Council a report on the results of its examination, accompanied, where appropriate, by a proposal for a Decision to denounce the ASOR, pursuant to Article 20 (2) thereof. 3. Where appropriate, the Commission shall give notification of denunciation of the ASOR, pursuant to Article 20 (2) thereof.
Article 10
1. If a Member State considers withdrawal from the ASOR to be necessary, it shall forward a reasoned request to the Commission and shall inform the other Member States thereof. The Commission shall examine the request and consult the Member States. 2. The Commission shall submit to the Council a report on the results of its examination, accompanied, where appropriate, by a proposal for a Decision to denounce the ASOR, pursuant to Article 20 (2) thereof. 3. Where appropriate, the Commission shall give notification of denunciation of the ASOR, pursuant to Article 20 (2) thereof.
One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".
Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.
A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.
Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.
Sign in to file itThink it through
Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.