Propose a change

Welfare Reform Act 2012

Write the words of this act the way you think they should read. Solon shows your change as a redline against the published text and pins it to that exact text, so it can never be applied to wording you did not see.

Change 1

What to do with it
As published

81 Required period condition: further provision

(1) Regulations under section 80(2) must provide for the question of whether a person meets “the required period condition” for the purposes of section 78(1) or (2) or 79(1) or (2) to be determined by reference to— (a) whether, as respects every time in the previous 3 months, it is likely that if the relevant ability had been assessed at that time that ability would have been determined to be limited or (as the case may be) severely limited by the person's physical or mental condition; and (b) whether, as respects every time in the next 9 months, it is likely that if the relevant ability were to be assessed at that time that ability would be determined to be limited or (as the case may be) severely limited by the person's physical or mental condition. (2) In subsection (1) “the relevant ability” means— (a) in relation to section 78(1) or (2), the person's ability to carry out daily living activities; (b) in relation to section 79(1) or (2), the person's ability to carry out mobility activities. (3) In subsection (1)— (a) “assessed” means assessed in accordance with regulations under section 80; (b) “the previous 3 months” means the 3 months ending with the prescribed date; (c) “the next 9 months” means the 9 months beginning with the day after that date. (4) Regulations under section 80(2) may provide that in prescribed cases the question of whether a person meets “the required period condition” for the purposes of section 78(1) or (2) or 79(1) or (2)— (a) is not to be determined in accordance with the provision made by virtue of subsections (1) to (3) above; (b) is to be determined in accordance with provision made in relation to those cases by the regulations.

Your change, as a redline

81 Required period condition: further provision

(1) Regulations under section 80(2) must provide for the question of whether a person meets “the required period condition” for the purposes of section 78(1) or (2) or 79(1) or (2) to be determined by reference to— (a) whether, as respects every time in the previous 3 months, it is likely that if the relevant ability had been assessed at that time that ability would have been determined to be limited or (as the case may be) severely limited by the person's physical or mental condition; and (b) whether, as respects every time in the next 9 months, it is likely that if the relevant ability were to be assessed at that time that ability would be determined to be limited or (as the case may be) severely limited by the person's physical or mental condition. (2) In subsection (1) “the relevant ability” means— (a) in relation to section 78(1) or (2), the person's ability to carry out daily living activities; (b) in relation to section 79(1) or (2), the person's ability to carry out mobility activities. (3) In subsection (1)— (a) “assessed” means assessed in accordance with regulations under section 80; (b) “the previous 3 months” means the 3 months ending with the prescribed date; (c) “the next 9 months” means the 9 months beginning with the day after that date. (4) Regulations under section 80(2) may provide that in prescribed cases the question of whether a person meets “the required period condition” for the purposes of section 78(1) or (2) or 79(1) or (2)— (a) is not to be determined in accordance with the provision made by virtue of subsections (1) to (3) above; (b) is to be determined in accordance with provision made in relation to those cases by the regulations.

One line that says what changes, such as "Halve the dog tax".

Who it helps, what it costs, what it fixes. It is what persuades people to support it.

A proposal here is not law. Support on Solon is evidence that people want the change; the official route says what it takes to make it law.

Sign in to file your proposal. What you have written stays on this page.

Sign in to file it

Think it through

Ask what your change would do, who would gain and who would bear a cost, and where something like it is already law. The assistant reads your draft as it stands, cites the law and the studies it finds, and takes no side. What you file stays yours.

Questions to start with
Think it through
Legal information from the published text, not advice for your case. Check the sources. Find a law · What the register holds